With regard to the data feed problem, my opinion is:
If apathetic miners don’t follow our discuss on forum or other social media, just ignore them, they are deserved to be controlled by other people since they are abstain from voting. I mean apathetic miners can mint BKS, but will have zero discourse power in company’s decision making.
They are adaults, not babies, we have no obligation to provide data feed to everyone although they can choose a data feed to save some time.
So no need to remind them to upgrade client from data feed, just discard them, and no need to provide default data feed to everyone, date feed is a good option, but not compulsory.
A lazy miner without timely client upgrade, usually also not interested in setting up a date feed, that’s why we thought a default data feed. But since most apathetic miners have no idea about the motions of their default data feed. No need to pretend to be so democracy.
We should combine the merits of decentralized and centralized system both of which have pros and cons.
We elect some reputed signers as our “board of directors”, and they are supposed to be professional and active and handle the daily oepration of this company, after any decision made by reputed sogners, there will be 15-30 days “publicity period” for shareholders to veto, and signers will move on.
If reputed signers make a decision to harm the majority of shareholders and shareholders are apathetic enough not to veto it, they are deserved.
We are all deserved for what we did, this is the rule of god.
