Updating the whitepaper is crucial if we want to be able to convince at least those who are interested in the background of the design of NuBits.
While the words of Daniel Larimer have been wisely chosen to discredit one of the strongest competitors, the technical aspects of his analysis haven’t been completely wrong - until the NBT burning has been decided by the NSR holders who voted for it.
And that was given the speed with that the motion to introduce burning the vast majority!
This is another aspect that could be highlighted when creating an update of or addendum to the whitepaper: it’s of the utmost importance for NSR holders to keep the peg! This is no longer a hope, it’s the declared will of NSR holders!
One way to handle posts like that of Dan would be to analyze their system and highlight their flaws (e.g. the risk of a collapsing market). But I agree with @JordanLee and others that it’s better to be constructive in the own area than trying to be destructive in others’ areas (the last two lines are the most important ones in my opinion).
Off the record: it might be tempting to hit a bully in the face. But that only makes you a bully, too.
