B&C Exchange 5.0.1 release - upgrade before 18 July!

ronny 2016-08-12 11:33:54 UTC #61

bitbucket source?

Sabreiib 2016-08-12 11:35:06 UTC #62

https://bitbucket.org/JordanLeePeershares/bcexchange/downloads

ronny 2016-08-12 11:37:39 UTC #63

you mean if I donwload once again, it should be able to solve matters?

backpacker 2016-08-12 12:00:14 UTC #64

just make sure to backup wallet.dat or use dumpprivkey method in debug console to save all of your addresses.

if simply installing 5.0.1 on top of 4.0.1 still does not sync after a long time, you can start fresh and after synchronisation is complete replace wallet.dat with saved copy or importprivkeys of your accounts.

ronny 2016-08-12 13:13:37 UTC #65

its all in stakes right now

ronny 2016-08-12 13:14:13 UTC #66

what would the date originally be called if not changed in name

mhps 2016-08-12 15:09:11 UTC #67

I don’t understand what you mean.

Anyway if you upgrade all your coins will be back.

ronny 2016-08-12 18:44:42 UTC #68

i have upgraded, but all coins are located as stake, and it seems to be continuing to synch

mhps 2016-08-12 23:44:18 UTC #69

re-run your client like

nud -rescan -daemon

on linux. similar for qt. this will rescan the b-chain and put coins where they should be.

backpacker 2016-08-13 05:08:20 UTC #70

Another thing to do is to enter repairwallet in debug window.

Sabreiib 2016-12-05 07:03:32 UTC #71

If we change blockchain time to 10 minutes, the performance of B&C exchange becomes 1/10?

sigmike 2016-12-05 08:03:10 UTC #72

What performance?

If you mean the CPU time required for minting as discussed recently in another post then no, that would not be changed by an increased time between blocks. There are other ways to reduce it though.

Sabreiib 2016-12-05 08:25:35 UTC #73

I mean the B&C platform trade/transaction volume handled by blockchain.

sigmike 2016-12-05 12:23:14 UTC #74

Then yes, the maximum possible transactions would be divided by 10.

But trading can happen without block confirmation. In the currently planned design orders could stack up in the mempool and confirmation would only be needed to make the actual fund transfer on the external blockchains. So some amount of trading burst above the block limit could be handled. But the design could also probably be changed to require less on-chain confirmations.

Sabreiib 2016-12-05 13:15:49 UTC #75

@sigmike, have you paid attention to the lightning network? It’s the next big thing.

sigmike 2016-12-05 20:03:08 UTC #76

Yes. We can’t use the same concepts, but it can be an inspiration.

NubitGuy 2016-12-11 20:00:36 UTC #77

when will you fix the Bcexchange wallet it keeps shutting down on start up FYI big exchanges wont list coins that have wallets that don’t work

Phoenix 2016-12-11 21:15:42 UTC #78

I would like see B&C 5 working reliably on Windows and OS X. Is there anyone currently running B&C on Windows or OS X?

It is a development matter mostly out of my hands, but I would certainly allocate funds to @sigmike or another developer to fix it.

crypto_coiner 2016-12-13 02:15:14 UTC #80

I have had 0 connections to the B&C network since 10/21 –
Any new working .conf file?

Phoenix 2016-12-13 04:11:39 UTC #81

This problem relates to seed nodes. I’m not clear on who is running those (if anyone at this point) or what happened to the ones we had. Can anyone fill in some relevant info here?