When a cold list is necessary, I will make another thread. A motion or grant can only leave this list in one of 3 ways: it passes, it is withdrawn by the author, or it is placed on the cold list.
To be placed on the hot list, a motion or grant must pass a Turing ttes administered by me, in addition to other criteria. I.e. I reserve the right to not list what I consider a spam motion.
Not sure if this is a good idea. The list is already old. There are a couple of mods, but only one Nagalim.
Or are the mods now supposed to edit Nagalim’s OP?
I don’t like it either but i’m willing to give it a shot for a day or two. I think what can be done is changing it to a “wiki” post so that anyone can edit it. Then mods and users can help to add/remove items if they’re of a certain user level. We’ll have a more permanent solution for organizing proposals very very soon.
Can I make a suggestion? It would be much more helpful if the title could be updated every time there is a new addition to the thread, that way people will know there is something new to vote on. For example…
Voting Hot List - (Last Updated: 10/10/15)
In addition to the date in the title, a new post should be made in this thread every time there is an addition or removal of a voting thread.
It’s not spamming if it serves the purpose of informing shareholders. Maybe removals can be left out, but at the very least additions should be posted. The date in the title can be glossed over, but it’s harder to ignore the blue new post notification that pops up.
I’ve changed this topic to a wiki post, and I’ve set wiki post editing to require a level 3 trust. Levels are automatically granted to users based on their time and participation on the board. Anyone who earns a level 3 trust will automatically be granted editing privilege.