[Passed] Proposal to run nuexplorer instance

Although I have no Nushare, I support you!

Run a datafeed, you dont need shares to have a say, just followers that have shares.

But I have no Nu wallet installed.

You’ll never know who follows you, but that’s not the important part, at least not for me.
Trying to contribute is.

Will add this to my datafeed soon.[quote=“backpacker, post:7, topic:3948”]
High penalty would just make me try harder to maintain SLA.
A SLA with 24h downtime before penalties is pretty lax. I dare to say that anything happening totally out of your control and you can proof that clearly, we won’t have you burning the 100NBT. At least I would advocate against it.

The objective of this was to have a better uptime of the Nu blockexplorer after several severe incidents lasting up to a week, instead we now have a second instance. So I hope we are good for at least the next 6 months.

1 Like


Added it it my data feed:


you forgot
"Sorry for the delay."

1 Like

lol. Well here the voting started only 2 days ago…


is there a reason why share days are so low for voters of this proposal?

does it mean current proposal is not interesting to old shareholders?

My understanding is that it’s more interesting for shareholders, who continuously vote than for shareholders who only occasionally vote.

That pretty much makes sense if you suppose that shareholders who continuously vote are more interested in getting data from blockexplorer regarding motions, votes, etc. and are not very happy with the availability of blockexplorer.nu, for which unfortunately no maintenance contract is available.

In my view it’s a good sign. Those who follow closely are in favour of your proposal. But that is just my interpretation.

But grant won’t pass unless occasional voters participate, we still need 50% of share days, right?

I think so. We will know once you have 5 percentage points more votes :wink:
One of the reasons why motions are easier.
Plus you don’t create custodial addresses, for contractors, which don’t need to broadcast liquidity, but could do it.
But that is a different matter. We have other problems at the moment :smiley:

1 Like

Will this completely replace blockexplorer.nu, since the previous contract ran out? At the moment I can’t access the main explorer linked from NuBits.com, so I assume it’s down. If so, then we’ll need to replace the links on the website to this new and more reliable version.

I know this is a carry over from the old explorer, but is there any reason why the custodial grants page is titled “Votes?” I think it should be titled “Grants” instead.

We should probably alter the styling of the explorer to use the Nu color scheme. Blue and white doesn’t really fit with Nu’s image. For example https://www.parkingyournubits.rocks/ adapted our color scheme and looks great.

1 Like

I agree, but…[quote=“masterOfDisaster, post:24, topic:3948”]
We have other problems at the moment
At least we have one blockexplorer working, glad we invested in that (still needs to pass though).

1 Like

Yeah, I meant we should do it in the future. Put it on the list of things to do I guess.

1 Like

Backpacker may remind us :sunglasses:

This proposal passed.


Proposal has passed, I’ve updated the repo with code for parked nubits and other improvements.


@backpacker Blockexplorer POS diff is 2 days behind.
@JetJet13 blockexplorer.nu (https://blockexplorer.nu/votes) is not working at all.