[Passed] Proposal to run nuexplorer instance

NuShares Passed Grants
#5

It’s just my opinion.
What exactly scares you?

#6

for the sever , i run two node at this https://www.wholesaleinternet.net/dedicated/

you can count for this : support fee and sever fee.

#7

What scares me are situations when events out of my control make me lose money. But then again, what are chances that 6 VPSes fail for such long period of time? :slight_smile:

High penalty would just make me try harder to maintain SLA.

#8

@backpacker , you should use another NuBits grant address. It is not allowed to use it twice.

2 Likes
#9

Thank you for that information , I didn’t realize. it makes sense of course.

#10

How can you create vanity addresses with a prefix length of 7 that fast?

ninjaedit: forget it - the new grant address has a prefix length of 5 :wink:
ninjaedit2: once you feel comfortable with the grant, promote it to [Voting]!
ninjaedit3: https://daology.org/proposals/0ba3c7cb8ebcf3c4a222e96611fe925c962e3920 needs an update!

I’d be such a good ninja!

#11

Proposal is open for voting!

1 Like
#12

Although I have no Nushare, I support you!

#13

Run a datafeed, you dont need shares to have a say, just followers that have shares.

#14

But I have no Nu wallet installed.

#15

You’ll never know who follows you, but that’s not the important part, at least not for me.
Trying to contribute is.

#16

Will add this to my datafeed soon.[quote=“backpacker, post:7, topic:3948”]
High penalty would just make me try harder to maintain SLA.
[/quote]
A SLA with 24h downtime before penalties is pretty lax. I dare to say that anything happening totally out of your control and you can proof that clearly, we won’t have you burning the 100NBT. At least I would advocate against it.

The objective of this was to have a better uptime of the Nu blockexplorer after several severe incidents lasting up to a week, instead we now have a second instance. So I hope we are good for at least the next 6 months.

1 Like
#17

+1

Added it it my data feed:

#18

Voted.

#19

you forgot
"Sorry for the delay."
:stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like
#20

lol. Well here the voting started only 2 days ago…

2 Likes
#21

is there a reason why share days are so low for voters of this proposal?

does it mean current proposal is not interesting to old shareholders?

#22

My understanding is that it’s more interesting for shareholders, who continuously vote than for shareholders who only occasionally vote.

That pretty much makes sense if you suppose that shareholders who continuously vote are more interested in getting data from blockexplorer regarding motions, votes, etc. and are not very happy with the availability of blockexplorer.nu, for which unfortunately no maintenance contract is available.

In my view it’s a good sign. Those who follow closely are in favour of your proposal. But that is just my interpretation.

#23

But grant won’t pass unless occasional voters participate, we still need 50% of share days, right?

#24

I think so. We will know once you have 5 percentage points more votes :wink:
One of the reasons why motions are easier.
Plus you don’t create custodial addresses, for contractors, which don’t need to broadcast liquidity, but could do it.
But that is a different matter. We have other problems at the moment :smiley:

1 Like