It’s like this:
This is the grant. It gives me the funds I need to continue operation. The term ‘home’ means that I fully expect this grant to pass or i will shut down NuPond. It is therefore incumbent upon shareholders to reach consensus with me on appropriate home pool parameters.
The other motion is purely about fixed cost. If this passes and that one doesn’t, I will do fixed reward on both pairs, like normal. If that motion passes and this grant doesn’t, shareholders are dumb and nupond will cease operation because it will run out of money.
If both pass I will be running fixed cost on nbt/btc and fixed reward on nbt/cny. There is no scenario where nbt/cny is not funded as a fixed reward pool, which is why it is my home alp and why I attached my grant to it.
The rollover funds are remnants from term 4.
That’s not strictly true, but it’s much closer than in fixed reward. If no LP is providing any liquidity on a single side, the pool has no one to payout to, so those funds roll over.
