Recently there has been less support for motions and custodial grants, most of which revolve around compensation for liquidity operations. There are two competing hypotheses that could explain this:
-
Some shareholders believe too much money is currently being spent on liquidity operations, so they are reluctant to vote for any grants to fund liquidity operations, resulting in lower support for most of the recent motions and grants.
-
Some shareholders are not paying attention and not configuring their vote any longer, either manually or via data feed.
This motion is designed to reveal which hypothesis is correct. If the first hypothesis is correct, we need to develop better specific proposals to limit liquidity operations expenses. If the second proves true, an entirely different response is needed to improve the ease of voting and perhaps even automate it more. A low rate of voting for this motion will support the second hypothesis, while a high rate of voting will support the first hypothesis.
Motion RIPEMD160 hash: 0940e0d267939f84c295731043dd6c95c005516a
=##=##=##=##=##=## Motion hash starts with this line ##=##=##=##=##=##=
This motion is intended as a test of shareholdersâ readiness to actively configure their vote. No action will be taken directly as a result of its passage. All shareholders should vote for it, as it contains nothing controversial and not voting for it will demonstrate some degree of weakness in our voting system.
=##=##=##=##=##=## Motion hash ends with this line ##=##=##=##=##=##=
Verify. Use everything between and including the <motionhash></motionhash> tags.
As is customary for motions, I have started it as a draft. Please indicate if you would like to see changes in the content. I will hash it in a couple days if there is no controversy over the content.
