Edit The final motion has been posted in this thread here: [Passed] Motion capping NuLagoon fees going forward. Please consider voting for the reasons in this thread. Thanks.
Motion Hash: draft
BEGIN DRAFT MOTION HASH ON NEXT LINE
The NuShareholders are becoming increasingly concerned about their limitless exposure in the scope of the liquidity service provisioning and monthly payments in time as result of the passing of motion b5e709a59226b979e4cb59e6d3a3e06b506e3761 for the liquidity provisions also knows as the NuLagoon.
Therefore the NuShareholders request the operator known as @henry to cap the costs of the operation to a maximum of 2,500 NBT per month and make an effort to inform the users of his pool of this new restriction and advertise his pool accordingly. Any excess fees above 2,500 NBT won’t be paid.
=##=##=##=##=##=## Motion ends on line above this ##=##=##=##=##=##=
To illustrate the concerns I and other Shareholders have, I have added a little story which hopefully shows the need to pass this motion in the short term:
Bob just helped Ann out by cleaning her house as there was no one to do it and she couldn’t do it herself. Bob and Ann agree that Bob can continue to clean the house. Next week Bob cleans the house and Ann is send an invoice which she pays.
The next week Bob brings a mate and cleans the house even better, he charges Ann double the amount though. His mate also needs to be paid and Ann agreed to clean the house and that is what they did and even better this time. Ann feels pressured by this and pays the bill as Bob is a good friend after all and helped her out.
The week after he brings two mates and they do a full clean inside and outside the house. The house looks almost perfectly clean and Bob is proud that he delivered this piece of work. However they charge Ann triple the amount. They cleaned the house and delivered the work so Ann needs to pay. Ann is not happy as she didn’t need such a thorough cleaning. And Ann cannot afford to pay for this any longer as she needs to pay bills to feed her family. Bob is now angry at Ann, can’t pay his mates and suffers reputational damage and threatens her to get her into court.
This story hopefully shows the loose-loose situation we are in. Both @henry and the shareholders can’t win in the long run. @henry’s reputation is at stake when the network fails to pay his liquidity providers and the network’s reputation is also at stake failing to pay and properly contract for a very important service based on needs. This wouldn’t look good in any case and potentially damages the Nu brand now and in the future.
On the passing of this motion, I will vote/support for paying this month’s and next month’s fees for NuLagoon without hesitation, as the new term has already started.
Your feedback on the content of this draft motion would be much appreciated before I submit it for voting.