[Passed] Compensation for Bitcoin.co.id LPC operation

[creon]

Hi,

I kept postponing this on and on due to the busy time with the pool development and Henrys proposal just reminded me that I also still get my reward for my LPC operation on bitcoin.co.id described here:

https://discuss.nubits.com/t/proposal-small-dual-side-liquidity-for-currently-uncovered-pair?source_topic_id=1948

Information about the trading activity can be found here: Proposal: Small dual-side liquidity for currently uncovered pair

In the original grant I asked for 10% on a BTC pair. 1 NBT was already paid in the initial grant, therefore I would like to ask you to add the following grant about 499 NBT to your voting:

B6BqkZdb79W2CT79o84j1pqnhs1R3w3QsB , 499 NBT

Be assured that everything will go into NSR since the whole operation was intended to understand the overall custodianship process and I anyway was asking for NSR in the first place.

Thank you in advance.

[tomjoad]

Voted.

[JordanLee]

The comments I made in another thread are just as relevant to this original post to compensate creon (just substitute Nu Lagoon for creon):

[PASSED] The Nu Lagoon Custodian Fee Request of Apr 2015

Unless someone comes forward with evidence showing there is a miscalculation in the NBT amount asked for (I have no reason to believe that is the case), all shareholders should be voting to pass this grant right now, regardless of whether you support the Nu Lagoon or not and regardless of whether you voted for the motion promising this payment. This is because shareholders authorized this payment in the motion referenced in the original post. To not pay it would severely damage the network's abi…

[crypto_coiner]

Will vote for it.

[cryptog]

voted.

[crypto_coiner]

The comments I made in another thread are just as relevant to this original post to compensate creon (just substitute Nu Lagoon for creon):

Actually, I think there’s a big difference between the 2 situations.
In henry’s compensation case, a motion provisions shareholders to grant him a compensation.
In creon’s compensation case, the primitive is a custodial grant, not a motion.
Legally speaking, the enforcement of no further action ensues from that point on.

However, creon operation was successful and must be rewarded according to the conditions under which shareholders knowingly provided the 1st part of the grant (1NBT) back in Jan’.

So, it is highly reasonable that shareholders should vote for this grant to complete the compensation (499 NBT)

[crypto_coiner]

voted.

[cshelswell]

voted

[creon]

The grant passed on block 319835. Voting took 6602 blocks. Thank you!

[cryptog]

The title of the OP should be edited to [passed] btw.