Good to see that the NuBot development goes on.
Is this idea still being followed[quote=“creon, post:28, topic:1175”]
I would really like to look a bit further again into using the NuBot in the TLLP client.
[/quote]
or did the approaches stop with @creon leaving?
I’m asking because of the tier 3 management options that are planned to be made available with version 0.3.4.
It would increase the security of funds by far if they could be held in tier 3 in times where the bot can’t place orders for a reward (or less reward than the taste of the liquidity provider requires).
To decrease the reward that is paid for liquidity providing by making liquidity providing less risky, that function would need to be included in the TLLP bot as well and not only in NuBot.
Ideally both bots would be merged (if technically feasible).
Nu assumes that B&C Exchange will mitigate the exchange default risk by far and reduce the costs of liquidity providing.
I think that assumption is valid.
But I also think that Nu should offer the tools for the safest possible way of providing liquidity at other exchanges as well - or shall Nu solely rely on B&C Exchange?
Liquidity providing at centralized exchanges might be necessary for some more time, I think.