It’s interesting to see the results, but I doubt it’s going to be a perfectly accurate method of determining distribution. Shareholders can easily lie or omit their response. All signs I’ve seen suggest that the initial distribution was fair, because Jordan Lee cared about establishing sufficient decentralization to maintain the robustness of the network. No outside actor can harm the network without coercing many different shareholders simultaneously.
My preference would be to keep only network-critical events (protocol updates, voting, announcements) pinned to ensure shareholder attention isn’t diluted. I suppose we haven’t really talked as a community what our policy is about the criteria for pinning posts though, so if another moderator wants to pin this I wouldn’t personally have an issue with it.
