Is XPM/TRC/FTC Delisting on BTC-E an Opportunity for NuBits?

BTC-E has announced that Feathercoin, Teracoin and unfortunately Peercoin’s sister coin, Primecoin will be delisted on February 1st due to low volume…

Is this an opportunity to get NuBits and NuShares on there? It seems that they’re opening up room for more popular cryptos with higher volume. Now may be the time to strike. We have the advantage of being linked with Peercoin, so maybe they’ll take that into consideration as long as we make them aware of it.

Submit a ticket on their support page:

Also PM their profile on BitcoinTalk:;u=33012


Flood em with emails showing volume data! I did already

I just added their support page to my initial post.

Finally movement from them after over a year. I’ve never gotten a response from BTC-E, so I think direct to the point images of volume and stability would be best.

I just sent BTC-e an email as well. I hope others will consider doing the same!

Here is my message to them. I tried to lean on our existing relationship with Peercoin. Please don’t copy it. Write your own message. I submitted a ticket on their website, as well as PM’ing their profile on BitcoinTalk here:;u=33012


Posted on Reddit:

I doubt that BTC-e will install a closed source wallet that could potentially kill their whole system :wink: But its a very good idea to make them notice about NuBits.

I doubt that exchanges run wallets in unprotected environments and with anything else than a very limited rights context…
So they might not like it, but it can be handled that the Nu wallet is still closed source.
If they refuse to integrate NBT just because of the wallet being closed source it can be taken as a reminder to think about the motion to open source the wallet, again. :wink:

I contacted them a while back about it, no reply. BTC-e didn’t even catch the doge train, which i respect them for. For some reason though i feel they will add NBT, call me crazy.

@teek, you are crazy! :stuck_out_tongue:

:smiley: NBTUSD pair on btc-e is just what the doctor ordered…

That’s true, but even a short down time is extremely expensive for an exchange like btc-e. Furthermore I can imagine that they implement the interfaces to their engine directly into the wallet software, for various reasons.

This. Or we decide in a special motion that the code can be shared with BTC-e only (secured by an NDA of course).

Without a custodian at btc-e it will be an interesting test for the speed of arbitrage trading.
But maybe your doctor is right and the prescription includes not only a NBTUSD trading pait, but an announcement and some time to get a custodian ready as well.
On a different take you could ask why to put a custodial grant on such an anonymous exchange that btc-e is, though.

Whom will you hold accountable if that NDA gets broken?
Where is btc-e?
Who is btc-e?

I doubt that this motion would have a chance to pass.

Yeah right, they are pretty shady :slight_smile: never got hacked so far though … Of course we would take that risk, you could include it in the proposal that we open source immediately on leak. I also think that you somehow can sue btc-e.

i’d take NBTUSD on btc-e in a second, i am pretty sure there is no problem with multiple custodians if nubot is running in USD as well… the problem is only with crypto pairs… is that correct @desrever ?

I’ve been trying to start my LPC for a long time as it was approved quite some time ago, but just hasn’t been working out… BTER still isn’t ready for multiple custodians as was originally proposed, and I just can’t take any exchange that lists XPY seriously.

Forget NBTUSD on btc-e. Exchanges want TRADING volume. Back and forth frantic speculative trading, that is. NBTUSD is not for trading. It is a service, best installed on the page of payment processors and gateways, forext exchangers, etc. .

We need to have something like coinoUSD already has-- simple interface to enable buying with USD on egopay, OKPay, PerfectMoney … It’s a surprise that coinoUSD hasn’t given Nu a run for its money, so to speak.


Very correct indeed :wink: