Continuing the discussion from jooize's comment in a locked thread

[lissajous]

Continuing the discussion from Lissajous' removed posts:

We want a productive environment, preferably positive. Rehashing beliefs of conspiracy referring past events seems unlikely to foster such atmosphere, but even distract from valuable work.

I can’t say I disagree at all. However this is exactly the attitude the Chief should have when rambling on about his version of the history of Nu.

[jooize]

I think he’s been good at that lately. Wouldn’t you be angry at people who try defame your project if you knew you hadn’t been malicious?

[lissajous]

If it was my project, I would have done everything within my power to assure the community that there was no need for any theories instead of ignoring a genuine concern like both you and @Phoenix have done.

[jooize]

Your concern about the shareholder he represents for the 200M NSR?

[lissajous]

Sure, that is the one time that comes to mind. To me, it is improper for that shareholder to not represent themselves. I think it would have been a productive display of shareholder empowerment but instead we are left to speculate. We literally have no other choice but to look at the past we want to move on from.

[jooize]

How would it really be different to have another individual come by and say the same thing? It could still just be your suspect doing it.

[lissajous]

We are distracting from the subject in which I made this topic. If you want to have this discussion, we should keep it organized and move your reply to the motion thread. I’ve already been over this.