B&C Voting Hot List - January 18, 2018

[zoro]

Grant Proposals:
– none

Motions:
– none

Cold Voting List:

This thread is for motions and grants that were up for voting for longer than 30 days and have not been withdrawn or passed.

[CoinGame]

[CoinGame]

5 posts were merged into an existing topic: Voting for default data feed providers

[cryptog]

By the way, what about the motion votes for reputed signers?
I forgot about the reason why we decided not to take them into account right now.
Is it because of this ?

[masterOfDisaster]

Yes, confirmed e.g. by

[Mandatory Upgrade] All minters need to upgrade to B&C Exchange 4.0.1

Alright, last night I set the number of reputed signers eligible for reward to 4 and the reward amount per block to 0.01 BKS. Both settings are in the reputation voting section. I didn't mint a single block all night after doing this. I also tried removing one of the two settings and keeping the other and then switching later on to see if only one of these settings was causing the problem, but it didn't make a difference. No blocks were minted. As soon as I removed reputation votes I started…

Maybe it wasn’t really the reputed signers, but something else:

[Mandatory Upgrade] All minters need to upgrade to B&C Exchange 4.0.1

@masterOfDisaster add me to the list of cryptog subscribers that weren’t minting. last block minted April 06, 2016 (I subscribed to his feed around that time) “errors” : “Unable to set key from data feed signature”

Nobody seems to know 100% for sure. As reputed signer voting isn’t necessary at the moment, we might deal with that later

[cryptog]

The list should be updated.

[Cybnate]

The list should be updated.

Yeah, we went from one of the most active forums, to a sleepy one with only a handful of people around.
Most of the major shareholders are not interested in discussing or maintaining a forum apparently. Even for B&C we are with a very small group on the forum. Over 70% is apathetic with minting and therefore likely to be in cold storage. This doesn’t bode well given the events with Nu. Still hoping for better outcomes though given that there is at least an opportunity to make some profits.

[masterOfDisaster]

we went from one of the most active forums, to a sleepy one with only a handful of people around.

I suppose there are a lot of people who don’t contribute here and now, because they already spent too much time for the puppet master.
As long as they are convinced their work benefits @Phoenix/@JordanLee more than anyone else, I see no reason for that to change.

Most of the major shareholders are not interested in discussing or maintaining a forum apparently.

Another explanation could be: there are not so many unknown major shareholders.

Even for B&C we are with a very small group on the forum. Over 70% is apathetic with minting and therefore likely to be in cold storage.

The distribution of BKS was completely intransparent.
That brings BCE in a situation similar to Nu, but without controversial motions to tell the good from the bad.

For Nu a fork migh help to kickstart the community.
For BCE I have no idea.

[Cybnate]

For BCE I have no idea.

We might need a controversial motion to find out…

[masterOfDisaster]

We might need a controversial motion to find out…

I’m afraid it won’t work this way.

@Phoenix/@JordanLee and his alleged motive have been unveiled.
His voting behaviour can be adjusted to blend in the good guys’ voting.

This cut is only possible at Nu, because there were votes when the allegations haven’t been discussed widely and publicly and if, they seemed as paranoia.
We can hope that Jordan didn’t attempt to blend in.

I’m done with what Nu ihas become and sadly BCE looks like collateral damage.
I will only rethink my position if groundbreaking changes happen, forks with a potential to eliminate Jordan being the most promising ones.

[Cybnate]

I’m afraid it won’t work this way.

@Phoenix/@JordanLee and his alleged motive have been unveiled.His voting behaviour can be adjusted to blend in the good guys’ voting.

That won’t be easy as to stop a controversial motion or grant still 50% of the active minting votes will be required. I agree with you that it might be a more measured voting profile this time and that wording such proposal won’t be easy, but at the end of the day shares will still need to vote and that will be transparent in the blockchain.

[cryptog]

Can someone update this hot list?

[backpacker]

don’t you have sufficient rights to do it yourself? it’s in wiki format

[cryptog]

I do have of course. Sorry for being too lazy to look in the passed proposals : …

[jooize]

Added

1. Phoenix for Custodian of B&C Funds
   e0a5d7cf4cab3951c497c3dae6bff1f1063afc2b
   [Passed] Phoenix for Custodian of B&C Funds

2. B&C Exchange should trade all US-NBT for NSR
   94c2541e909b1240ac478571305809cd23295a21
   [Passed] B&C Exchange should trade all US-NBT for NSR

3. Reward for listing BlockShares on an exchange
   711211e73b8b3770bb48e8ef6ab1d17c9bf38299
   [Passed] Reward for listing BlockShares on an exchange

[cryptog]

Removed

1. Motion to elect Sigmike as B&C’s technical leader
   c1e9a92ca18591e78c7489b658bf414da7bd1a2e
   [Passed]Motion to elect Sigmike as B&C’s technical leader

2. Phoenix for Custodian of B&C Funds
   e0a5d7cf4cab3951c497c3dae6bff1f1063afc2b
   [Passed] Phoenix for Custodian of B&C Funds

3. B&C Exchange should trade all US-NBT for NSR
   94c2541e909b1240ac478571305809cd23295a21
   [Passed] B&C Exchange should trade all US-NBT for NSR

4. Reward for listing BlockShares on an exchange
   711211e73b8b3770bb48e8ef6ab1d17c9bf38299
   [Passed] Reward for listing BlockShares on an exchange

because they passed.

[cryptog]

Added

1. Phoenix compensation to change from USNBT to NSR
   0a1fec128cf6625a6ae4cdd8c77025e8aecb9ae7
   [Passed] Phoenix compensation to change from USNBT to NSR

[cryptog]

Removed

1. Phoenix compensation to change from USNBT to NSR
   0a1fec128cf6625a6ae4cdd8c77025e8aecb9ae7
   [Passed] Phoenix compensation to change from USNBT to NSR

[cryptog]

Put below into B&C Voting Cold List - January 18, 2018

1. Crypto_Coiner’s Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C
   0462d8f55b7e59957e2e0c2d77913749383a9bb8
   [Voting] Crypto_Coiner’s Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C

2. Cryptog’s Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C
   10b8b8452f10c025318e5837586e93ddcb020fb4
   [Voting] Cryptog's Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C

3. masterOfDisaster’s Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C
   04cb50e90a91350e6f3e1e74c6127d2705fd6915
   [Voting] masterOfDisaster's Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C

4. Cybnate’s Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C
   c02ce082d1a88bc1a9867b3eccee534169954c6e
   [Voting] Cybnate's Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C

5. Default BCE Datafeed - Nagalim
   67c7b0d207e64923121f4fca8420cffe57b87ed6
   https://daology.org/p/687c0a13f543389712af9d278e9e1080ffcf71a3