I just want to let everyone here know that the loudest BTS community members are not representative of BTS stakeholders as a whole.
I want to make a point of emphasizing that BM’s blog post about nubits comes from legitimate concerns about how nubits is structured which many of us share. Unfortunately he is not known for understanding how people will interpret his statements. From his point of view he was giving an objective analysis, but of course emotionally laden words like “ponzi” taint the discussion of the fundamentals.
What is even more unfortunate is the hordes of zealots that have been slandering your project, and interpreted Dan’s posts as “permission” to do so.
It’s been suggested that Dan and Jordan should have a recorded discussion/debate to make sure we understand the nuances of each others’ designs which I think will have the side-effect of making our respective fanboys realize there’s no reason to attack each other (we have more angry fanboys but you will get your fair share when you grow a bit bigger ;)). What do you think?