Voting for default data feed providers

Hi, @Cybnate, @Cryptog, @crypto_coiner, @masterOfDisaster, is it convenient to provide your motion hash for default data feed provider, data feed url, signature url and signature address. I need collect these informations for the default feed install. Also anyone who want to be the default data feed provider could post their information here. How many candidates for the default data feed providers will be better, so far we have four? Right?

1 Like

I’m working on getting a feed going as well. I should have a definitive answer for myself by tomorrow.

1 Like

I was wondering, would it also be possible to get a “default” data feed that is an average of the other “default” data feeds. So say 3 out of the 4 vote in favor of a proposal this datafeed would then also vote for the proposal. Say 1 out of 4 vote in favor of the proposal the “average” data feed would then also abstain voting in favor of the proposal. This would be a nice option for shareholders who are unsure which datafeed to pick but still want automated voting as they would in essence vote in conjuncture with the majority of the data feeds thus guaranteeing only supporting motions for which there is good consensus among feed providers.

It would also help with giving the feed providers more voting power without that power going to a single feed/provider.

Hi @Eleven,

here’s the link with data about my data feed:

Here’s my application as data feed provider:

I can post all requested information here, but I thought linking the source should be preferred.

Cool, the link is better. Thank you:slight_smile:

My applicatio is here: [Voting] Cryptog's Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider for B&C

here: Crypto_Coiner’s B&C Exchange data feeds

1 Like

The influence of any default data feed provider is not strongly related to the number of installations but to the amount of shares behind these installations. This is a gamble.

Frequency voting seems more fair but let we first try default data feeds.

I see this as more of a temporary measure that needs to be taken. Default data feeds don’t require as much development time, so they’re being implemented as a short-term solution. Frequency voting will take a lot more development time, but it would eventually replace default feeds as the more long-term solution against apathetic voters. At least that’s how I see it.

we can combine default data feeds with frequency voting. The original concept of the default for freq voting was to just vote the way the network is voting (call this the ‘absent’ data feed). We could also have default weights for different data feeds in addition to the absent one. So like 20% cryptog, 20% cybnate, 20% crypto_coiner, 20% masterOfDistaster, 20% absent vote. And this would be a random stochastic process every time someone mints a block with the default feed, so it would not be dependent upon how many shares different installations have.

2 Likes

@eleven The thread with my B&C feed details is here: Cybnate's B&C datafeed - BETA

got it. Thanks

Could you please provide your motion hash ? I did not find in the link page.

Crypto_Coiner’s Motion to Apply as Default Datafeed Provider: motion hash
0462d8f55b7e59957e2e0c2d77913749383a9bb8

Nagalim's B&C datafeed - BETA
67c7b0d207e64923121f4fca8420cffe57b87ed6

so far I got the statical information.
getdatafeedproviders
{
“providersamount” : 4,
“totalblocks” : 3985,
“providers” : [
{
“provider” : “crypto_coiner”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptocoiner/bcex_data_feed2/master/crypto_coiner_bcex_data_feed.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptocoiner/bcex_data_feed2/master/crypto_coiner_bcex_data_feed.json.signature”,
“url” : “8GDKT2yJ4XfQzPyixtcBSWaoUAnpgwNFrP”,
“blocks” : 59,
“percentage” : 3.70835952
},
{
“provider” : “cryptog”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptog/bcexchange_data_feed/master/cryptog_bcexchange_data_feed.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptog/bcexchange_data_feed/master/cryptog_bcexchange_data_feed.json.signature”,
“url” : “8Pii9Ectrm3hGPiu1wr7nMqxabUeSpdrqY”,
“blocks” : 467,
“percentage” : 29.35260842
},
{
“provider” : “cybnate”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cybnate/BKS-datafeed/master/Cybnate-main.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cybnate/BKS-datafeed/master/Cybnate-sig.txt”,
“url” : “8U4ptdMup2MQ1uwVNNYqYv4btzmFyAuDju”,
“blocks” : 455,
“percentage” : 28.59836581
},
{
“provider” : “masterofDisaster”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Lamz0rNewb/BCExchange-datafeed/master/masterOfDisaster.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Lamz0rNewb/BCExchange-datafeed/master/masterOfDisaster.json.txt”,
“url” : “8LKJw8fnrtvgX1BegUeU5inwbQ6dvjMDoU”,
“blocks” : 610,
“percentage” : 38.34066625
}
]
}
sorry @Nagalim, when i did that, I don’t know your data feed, later i can add it .

1 Like

the percentage is one in the four providers. the total blocks is the amount after April 25, 00:00:00.

1 Like

So far the data feed providers statistical info:

p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }

{
“providersamount” : 5,
“totalblocks” : 4865,
“providers” : [
{
“provider” : “Nagalim”,
“url” : "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nagalim/BCE-Datafeed/master/Nagalim.json ",
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Nagalim/BCE-Datafeed/master/Nagalim.json.signature”,
“url” : “8e54bBNQwSfvABrvDSAD6Kv1BJ8S9vJmUo”,
“blocks” : 179,
“percentage” : 7.88893786
},
{
“provider” : “crypto_coiner”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptocoiner/bcex_data_feed2/master/crypto_coiner_bcex_data_feed.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptocoiner/bcex_data_feed2/master/crypto_coiner_bcex_data_feed.json.signature”,
“url” : “8GDKT2yJ4XfQzPyixtcBSWaoUAnpgwNFrP”,
“blocks” : 124,
“percentage” : 5.46496254
},
{
“provider” : “cryptog”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptog/bcexchange_data_feed/master/cryptog_bcexchange_data_feed.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cryptog/bcexchange_data_feed/master/cryptog_bcexchange_data_feed.json.signature”,
“url” : “8Pii9Ectrm3hGPiu1wr7nMqxabUeSpdrqY”,
“blocks” : 608,
“percentage” : 26.79594535
},
{
“provider” : “cybnate”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cybnate/BKS-datafeed/master/Cybnate-main.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cybnate/BKS-datafeed/master/Cybnate-sig.txt”,
“url” : “8U4ptdMup2MQ1uwVNNYqYv4btzmFyAuDju”,
“blocks” : 562,
“percentage” : 24.76862054
},
{
“provider” : “masterofDisaster”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Lamz0rNewb/BCExchange-datafeed/master/masterOfDisaster.json”,
“url” : “https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Lamz0rNewb/BCExchange-datafeed/master/masterOfDisaster.json.txt”,
“url” : “8LKJw8fnrtvgX1BegUeU5inwbQ6dvjMDoU”,
“blocks” : 796,
“percentage” : 35.08153372
}
]
}

2 Likes

It’s probably best to put this info in the data feed voting thread. Maybe someone can move it?

it would be great to do the same for Nu .