I think Decentralization is a means for an end - If that end is not superior to or not achievable by Centralization, then it is not worth it and why all the hustle? buzz?
Cheap & Secure stability is one end.
There are tradeoffs to polarized implementations. Through time and effort those tradeoffs can be minimized and in some cases it’s possible to get “the best of both worlds”. I think the focus on decentralized systems is still fairly new and we’re yet to see what is possible and how many tradeoffs we can minimize.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1381251.0;prev_next=prev
WHAT IS SYSCOIN?Syscoin is a revolutionary cryptocurrency that not only allows low-cost financial transactions like Bitcoin, but provides businesses the infrastructure to trade goods, assets, digital certificates and data securely.
ABOUT DAO GOVERNANCE
http://ventureequity.exchange/
EMPOWERING VENTURES EVERYWHERE
Built on the Ethereum Blockchain, VΞX uses Turing-complete contracts to simplify venture governance, fund raising, asset management, financial reporting, auditing, and shareholder relations.
Why is the official twitter account promoting functions which are not implemented yet?
I’ll adjust the messaging if you think it’s controversial. We want people downloading the wallet and seeing the underlying trading mechanics (such as voting for signers, voting for fees, etc.) even if actual trades are not yet enabled.
"Etheropt is a decentralized options exchange built on Ethereum"
http://etheropt.github.io
ThanksCoin
"Reputation Ranking and monetary reward of Internet users"
Out of curiosity, how does B&C Exchange main idea compare with zero knowledge proof-based decentralized exchange (ex: http://roberts.pm/zk_exchange) ?