What good is a peg at any rate, if there’s no revenue with that the costs and debts can be countered?
Realize it: the peg is gone.
Use this opportunity.
You can make changes that would seem unthinkable with an intact peg!
You need to create reliable ways to generate revenue first.
Then you can try to figure out what peg can be afforded (at what level, how tight)
And for god’s sake, start with an accounting and get control over the financial situation!
That sounds like you are running after a shadow that’s called “liquidity engine”, although you don’t know how to fuel it.
Do you want to run a business or chase dreams?
Wouldn’t the NSR sales (for NBT purchase) required by FLOT when the Standard is less than a certain threshold meet the definition of a debt/equity swap? That is a central part of my plan.
This multi-identity thing is really fascinating, I wonder how many JL alts there are around, I have several in suspicion. Speaking of which, how do prevent sybil attacks of those anonymous signers in B&C again?
Here is the deal: I modify both software packages for free, if you
Bring back MoD, which most certainly requires an apology
Publish any imaginable number about funds, how much, are they locked up, where are they (who is Angela btw, lol) or whatever our new accounting specialists @nmei and @ConfusedObserver can think of.
Come back with your real account and use your skills to take part in existing proposals for revenue streams
Want this 10 cent Nubit? Tomorrow evening you have the software if above points are fulfilled by @JordanLee.
A 10 cent peg will destroy Nubits. Its literally like pouring gas on your burning house saying “well I can build it again” instead of salvaging the frame work.
“Why choose a low peg? We aren’t playing the market to our advantage by cutting the value short. Why don’t we wait and see where nbt stabilizes and work to support it there instead of cut its value by more than half to rush a pegged position immediately.” <-- Exactly, this was my point earlier.
If I remember correctly the stake modifier in PPC was planned to be changed to the one in blackcoin, but that’s about it. But also DPOS didn’t prove as particularly elegant so far. On the paper Casper looks best to me, or in general the idea of uncles such that you have to bet on forks. But this has yet to be proven to work that well in reality.
But considering the consensus algorithm to work sufficiently well, I don’t see any problem with the peershare template itself, so I would also be curious what you mean by that. Maybe it is not useful, but using the coinbase in blocks of PoS coin as voting mechanism is in my opinion correctly implemented by the template.
: