No MaVo, you failed in your persistent and open attempts to bury Nu and B&C Exchange. Demand for Nu’s products has grown about 800% so far this year. That is a big success, one which I am clearly more responsible for than any other individual. Which of our competitors is paying you for your lies and slander?
You’re going to need to elaborate on the circumstances and show your work if you expect me to think anything other than this is your usual shenanigans, @Phoenix. Per usual you have created a situation where the entire network needs to trust your horrible reputation here.
Right unreliable multisig team according to you. What did we have before? Multisig is as reliable as the underpinning contracts for the team participating in it. I believe we can do better than what has been shown previously.
At least it is better than having funds in the hands of a single actor with all its risks. Don’t let get the perfect in the way of the good I would say.
2 Likes
My imagination tells me @Phoenix locked a shareholder out of their funds and now is claiming them for himself. We’ll never know the truth unless @Phoenix looks up what transparency means in the dictionary.
That isn’t plausible. All the shareholder would have to do is come to the forum with a signed message and say so. That isn’t happening.
Prove it. This shareholder can explain to his peers what is going on with a signed message.
1 Like
I paid $20,000 for BKS. Where is my money? Did you “lose” it or did I “lose” it?
Oh, and btw: willing to purchase my BKS at $4 a piece?
I’d also like to point out that any discussions and the fork that blacklisted the funds was not authorized by Nu Law. The scope of your authority is limited to Liquidity Operations until you voluntarily gave up the responsibility of managing private keys holding shareholder funds after you lost 300 million NSR. (allegedly)
Implementing a quarantine of funds requires a fork with more minting power (shareholder support) than any other fork. Whether a fork, motion or custodial grant, the standard is the same: majority support by minting NuShare holders. This case was no exception.
1 Like
I find that very hard to believe. We use proof of stake to align the interests of everyone who has control on the blockchain. Your behavior certainly doesn’t align with shareholder interests. If your claim is true, that would mean you are working consistently and purposefully to undermine your own compelling interests. Are you suggesting you are stupid enough to undermine your own interests?
Way to ignore the big question. How do we know someone didn’t die and now you are trying to claim the funds for yourself? Why can’t this shareholder make their case to us without you?
1 Like
I am suggesting I am not stupid enough to purchase a single NSR! I suggest I was stupid enough to entrust a scammer like you with my money to build something great with it. I suggest you are not stupid enough to purchase my BKS for the price that you once asked me to pay?
so if i lose my nsr, i can make a motion to ask for recreating out of thin air. Shouldn t that the fault of the one that lost them? Shouldn t that none of the business of shareholders? seriously.
1 Like
It should come as no surprise to anyone who has concerns about share distribution that this grant is getting precisely 55% of votes since it was posted. Meanwhile nobody has made clear that they support this besides @Phoenix, but there sure are a lot of unanswered questions that conveniently get ignored.
2 Likes
bey bey NSR
The share distribution of Nu is completely fucked and scammers now directly control the network. Building anything on Nu is like building on top of quick sand, a complete and utter waste of time and money.
And I’m sure the distribution of B&C is probably just as bad by now. I would never entrust my money to B&C. I can see it now, significant funds will be deposited over a period of time and then at the right moment Jordan will cash in by draining all depositor funds to his accounts. It’s a disaster waiting to happen.
1 Like
Haven’t you been paying attention? Jordan is the only one who is allowed to get his money back. He uses this network to continually enrich himself by playing suckers.
1 Like
@Dhume’s BlockShares have not been returned because of an unexpected technicality with the amount of transaction outputs causing a huge transaction which failed to sign.
B&C Exchange shareholders can grant the 7,500 BKS to an address provided by @Dhume, but the multisig would remain a problem. Hard-forking the multisig out is rather avoided, but to consider.
Yes, you can. Everything is the business of shareholders. If they believe it to benefit their goals, they’ll reimburse losses for customers, exchanges, or shareholders.