Btw, in terms of performance, i suppose you guarantee that your code will be working well on Pis with their memory limitation, which seems it was not the case with existing Pi binaries.
EDIT: typo
EDIT2: ponctuation
This is not part of the grant and depends on the Nu source code.
2.1.1 (once itâs complete) will require much less RAM than 2.0.3.
For 2.0.3 I say, the hardware requirement is 1 GB RAM.
2.1.1 should do with 512 MB RAM.
The RAM requirements are based on my experience so far.
It might differ, if you have a lot if NSR in your wallet, which require additional RAM (at least when minting). This is what e.g. @mhps wrote and it makes sense.
1 Like
I just hope that before nubox is completed a new Rpi with 2GB ram will be out 
Get an ASRock BeeBox and put 16 GB RAM in it 
What are the main differences between NuBox and Nu Pi binary?
Other than
?
1 Like
I seems that vote is close to 10% now (278,933,012/2,830,134,133) with not more than 6-7 addresses participating.
You need a data feed to take you up. @cryptog, @cybnate, @crypto_coiner are our three câs of the data feeds. Without at least one data feed itâs very very difficult to get something passed.
Yes, what do you guys think? I think itâs pretty straightforward and weâre lucky to have Peerchemist on board for this project going forward.
Itâs also a step in the direction of getting support for BCE, which may be more important for the anonymity of reputed signers. Letâs officially establish a working relationship with Peerchemist on Nu first though, and then weâll see what the future brings.
Yeah! Especially the built-in TOR support is a nice feature!
Maybe not all reputed signers are savvy, nor should they necessarily need to be!
NuBox would indeed be a step into the right direction that can be had at $4k.
I want to know if nubox would make it very easy for someone to set up a nu client into a Pi.
I have a Pi (that I bought when I wanted to try peerbox 2y ago btw 
) but I did not try to install the Nu binaries into it because it looks cumbersome and a bit buggy.
Will NuBox be very easy to install?
Install Raspbian on your RaPI.
sudo apt-get install nubox
âŚor whatever the package might be called.
Run it.
Done.
Have a look here to see how easy itâs for the Peercoin equivalent:
2 Likes
Exactly.
However this is more accurate tutorial on how to install Peerbox: https://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=4468.msg42262#msg42262
It is left to user to install Raspbian as underlying OS, after that it is just
sudo apt-get install peerbox.
NuBox will be just the same.
2 Likes
About 48h since voting started proposal is at 117 votes (1.17%) and 539,569,314/3,017,361,624 SDD (17.88%) with not more than 6-7 addresses voting.
@peerchemist, sometimes it can take a little bit for a motion or grant to gain some momentum. There are a lot of things currently going on, so shareholder attention is probably spread out. I donât see any reason why this wonât end up passing, but itâs possible it might take some time. I hope you can understand that.
@cryptog, @Cybnate, @crypto_coiner, do you have any other criticisms? I think we should get the ball rolling on this, so will you support it?
Super weird that the SDD is so high. Somebodyâs pulling out some ancient NSR to support this.
1 Like
But whereâs the support from the rest of the shareholders?
Itâs not like Nu wouldnât profit from this offerâŚ
I was just commenting on latest stats to bump the thread up as it is Friday and I guess more people will see it. I know it is too early.
However it is a fact that those who run the data feeds have not enlisted this into their feeds just yet even though they have participated in this thread.
1 Like
I think maybe a lot of shareholders are super dependent on data feeds. That would explain it I think. I myself use one because Iâm not always home to change voting.
Itâs on voting for 3 days now.
That level of support without discussion or suggestions how to improve it, isâŚ
Well, it reminds me of the upgrade of the BCE client. I better stop here.