You guess wrong in some parts (especially the bold one)
This gateway was designed for and announced as for emergencies only.
The fee structure provides an incentive for shareholders to offer or foster cheaper services if they want to do that or use what they get offered.
Now that the gateway was used for the first time and is free for the first 45 days it’s too expensive?
I better digest this information some more instead of writing what crosses my mind…
I guess you are aware that Nu didn’t even have additional NuBots at Poloniex if I hadn’t acted the way I did.
I don’t intend to do this as regular service.
This has several reasons.
- I already did it for over a week in January as “extraordinary” service (at 0 fee more or less around the clock) and it left traces. I don’t blame anyone, but me, though. I take better care for me now.
- my job situation is different now and I can’t always offer high quality service, because I’m more often on business trips than before.
It is, because I don’t really want to do it any longer, but don’t want to leave Nu without additional (to the “regular” gateways at Poloniex) safety measures.
I might create a motion for additional single sided gateway services at other exchanges at moderate prices.
NSR holders can keep this gateway for emergencies and motivate others to provide regular NuBot services.
It’s just too convenient for NSR holders to let others do the work.
It’s always the same people who do the work.
I will terminate my NuBot services at Poloniex, if NSR holders intend to dictate the fees for which I shall offer them.