Indeed. I will give MoD a day to put up a motion then i will do so. Mine will pay MoD 125 NBT for a 30 day period starting when the motion is passed (and will discontinue the current pay model). MoD will be free to end service at will. Of course, it would be better if MoD did the motion.
Edit: i totally misread it and thought it was increasing by 5 nbt each day rather than each month. 450 nbt/month is still a whole lot.
You guess wrong in some parts (especially the bold one)
This gateway was designed for and announced as for emergencies only.
The fee structure provides an incentive for shareholders to offer or foster cheaper services if they want to do that or use what they get offered.
Now that the gateway was used for the first time and is free for the first 45 days itâs too expensive?
I better digest this information some more instead of writing what crosses my mindâŚ
I guess you are aware that Nu didnât even have additional NuBots at Poloniex if I hadnât acted the way I did.
I donât intend to do this as regular service.
This has several reasons.
I already did it for over a week in January as âextraordinaryâ service (at 0 fee more or less around the clock) and it left traces. I donât blame anyone, but me, though. I take better care for me now.
my job situation is different now and I canât always offer high quality service, because Iâm more often on business trips than before.
It is, because I donât really want to do it any longer, but donât want to leave Nu without additional (to the âregularâ gateways at Poloniex) safety measures.
I might create a motion for additional single sided gateway services at other exchanges at moderate prices.
NSR holders can keep this gateway for emergencies and motivate others to provide regular NuBot services.
Itâs just too convenient for NSR holders to let others do the work.
Itâs always the same people who do the work.
I will terminate my NuBot services at Poloniex, if NSR holders intend to dictate the fees for which I shall offer them.
Then i understand that you want to avoid this operation and you are offering a reason for shareholders to stop you
But not before you spoil us (shareholders) once again by offering a free service!
I would not be surpised if shareholders decide for you to continue the operation even if you charge 1000/month.
What then? how are you going to offer a âqualityâ service?
Right. And for the first 45 days I wonât charge any fee at all.
It would be good to bring an âemergency solutionâ not even close to those 45 daysâŚ
Thatâs exactly what I offered and what I will deliver it - if necessary for full 45 days.
Only after 2016-04-20 or when the gateway gets activated again after the operation has been ceased in between.
The first 45 days are free.
The next 30 days cost 15 NBT/day.
The 30 days after that cost 20 NBT/day.
etc.
It canât be very bad to keep some distance from mid price with this last resort. @Cybnateâs PyBot will keep a tighter offset, because the PyBot runs within limits of the ALP server.
So there will be a âtieredâ offset scheme, sorted by offset:
ALP -> @Cybnateâs PyBot -> your NuBot -> my NuBot
The pybot cybnate is running is off her personal server script. She can make the tolerance anything she wants. Shes not trying to get compensated via alp.
Yes, we do.
At first glance itâs for the benefit of Nu, because Nu is with the liquidity provision scheme on the âmakerâ side (for which fees were reduced by 0.05%).
Itâs good to make âtakersâ aware (by increasing the fee by 0.05%) that they need to pay for the âserviceâ of others who provide liquidity.
Maybe I should increase the bot offset to 0.025
My bot is the ideal playground as I expect it to be discontinued quite soon - no later than 2016-04-19
This was done by my discretion to balance the liquidity situation:
I recommend an appropriate deposit of NBT in turn. Maybe I can craft a tx later.
Would be good to deposit NBT to @zoroâs and my gateway in the same tx as he followed the recommendation to balance as well.