I invite voters to enter the same percentage for each period. The number you are entering is an Annual Percentage Rate (APR), therefore it will linearly scale with time. There is little to no reason to have non-linearity and make things more complicated.
For example, voting 5% for all periods will results in the following rates :
2.8 days premium : 0.013% (not even worth the tx fee of 0.01 probably)
...
2.5 months premium : 1.25 %
5 months premium : 2.5%
1 year premium : 5%
2 years premium : 10%
...
Use this spreadsheet to make your own linear rate math
to make a concrete example , if you use @cryptog 1% for 11.4 days , you imply that someone parking 1000 (one thousands) NuBits will receive ~ 0.3 NuBit as a premium for parking for more than ten days ( minus 2* tx fee ).
I do not think that thirty cents of a dollar is exactly an attractive perspective if we want to attract anybody to buy NBT just for the sake of parking.
With my proposed 5% the same guy above will make 4 NBT for parking 1000 NBT for a month. It is still very conservative.
And if you are worried that using this parking rates can inflate the supply, think again : we are soon voting for a 27k NBT grant for android development. With a 5% APR It will require someone to park 500k NuBits (1 fourth of current supply) for one year to get an equivalent in premium.
Please read