Continuing the discussion from [Draft] A grant to make NuBot work with Liquidity Pools:
yes, however the compensation for providing tier2 liquidity (aka, premium price ±) needs to be re-discussed. The ALP server, which is in charge of determine the payout, will be making the math (cc @woolly_sammoth) . But shareholders must give inputs on that.
The simplest thing to do is offer 0 reward for tier2 on the assumption that if orders ever gets filled they make a profit to the operator (spread). On the other hand the operator can argue that he is risking his funds by keeping it on the exchange and therefore deserve a non-zero reward.
Can someone with more experience in pools and reward open a new thread to discuss a possible compensation model that varies with the offset from 1$? In my opinion should also be a function of the market , e.g. USD tier2 —> 0 pay, EUR tier2 ----> almost 0 payout , BTC tier2 -----> little payout)
I imagine all shareholders must be involved in the philosophical discussion while I imagine some more techie proponents should came out with a model to embed those ideas… ( cc @Nagalim ) .
Let’s try to come up with something together and then hash out a motion so there is no confusion from here on.