T2 becomes T1 automatically as T1 vanishes. We cannot control the flow of T2 --> T1.
Some days ago T1+T2 had 20 BTC. Now they have 10 BTC even ta 5% buy offset!
Imagine what will happen if we lower the spread!
We prefer to have no buy side at all than to have some at high offset?
edit:
ok, lets try something else
buy offset at 4% and more fnds in T1:
As I understand the reported liquidity, if that is what you referred to, has been a dodgy issue. All grant addresses can report liquidity even it’s not used for liquidity provision. Right @masterOfDisaster ?
As long as they have been granted in the last 6 months or rather x blocks, where x should be approximately 260,000.
That’s the reason why I wanted to make FLOT (or another group) pay for expenses rather than making grants.
FLOT members,
please don’t forget about below term in my dual gateway motion:
"End of operation:Operation is ceased by request of withdrawal of all funds or if operator sends all funds to FLOT multisig address(es). "
I would prefer if you want me to cease the gateway operation like that than to vote the despicable motion
that has the sole purpose to stigmatize community members!
Thanks!
I would prefer if you want me to cease the gateway operation like that than to vote the despicable motion that has the sole purpose to stigmatize community members!
Yeah, you are right
It is hilarious if you think that the gateway operators can be stopped by a simple request from FLOT
in an instance!
If the motion passes, then FLOT is incompetent too because they fail to stop the incompetent operators.
In fact, shareholders are also incompetent since they elected FLOT!
Very funny
