本帖最后由 sabreiib 于 2015-1-16 10:52 编辑文章来自
holders have been to the center, but also want to go to the center of the depositary must coincide with NSR holder status, and must using Smart mortgage contract to manage the large number of small custodian, otherwise feasible. Collateral trust issues can be resolved. As for the relationship between the market value of NBT and NSR (mortgage rates, risk) that is determined by the market, to the invisible hand.
Mortgaged his own people get NBT NSR on the exchange acts as custodian, assumed operational risk, you can get additional NSR, as involved in the same POS mining. NSR and the entire system will only accept as collateral, BTC did not qualify, the only way to ensure maximum weaken the attacker’s motivation: You can use NBT system to malicious attacks Nu anchor, but your NSR will depreciate.
And to do so you can achieve a short-term loan Hayek (1-2 weeks) to adjust the NBT liquidity purposes, as long as we vote a new mortgage rate, then the NSR can loan out of NBT change. In extreme cases, if the market demand for NBT 0 vote mortgage rate is set to 0, then 1-2 weeks all NBT will freeze back to the system. Hayek’s idea of powerful short-term loans.
Bts of bitusd is also a solution. But seemingly not as good as nubits liquidity on, you see all exchange traded strong thickness can be. Hayek gives two specific regulation of currency circulation way, the first one is through the sale / repurchase of money selling this point bts and nubit have done it, but the second merit of short-term loans, has yet to virtual currency implementation. I believe that Hayek described by an effective regulation of the circulation of money in the event that countries will feel uneasy zf, this is a real threat, they want to strangle this kind of money, then they found into a people’s war to the center the vast ocean!