The protocol can differentiate between votes cast for one custodial grant proposal from another easily using the
<grant address> + <amount> structure. For (most) humans, I’d wager that it’s easier to describe and discuss a proposal with a name or number in the middle of a discussion:
than it would to use
Bb1MQPPXcQWgUdtyVxy1EkoQR4MyxZDP + 247900
BFengGPU6zhuRsuS8RRBWP2Ux8n4tEYB5x + 12650
This would be a purely cosmetic syntax for use here on the forums. I don’t have a good solution yet to this (perceived) problem, and I’d like the Community’s feedback.
Is this a concern, and if it is, do you have any recommendation on a format to use?