@masterOfDisaster Right now, you canât unless you go low level.
That script changes everytime anyone signs, so that is why they are different.
Anyway it will not have any effect if it is wrong, it is not a security problem, the transaction will simply not work.
I have been thinking about a section to do that, and to combine signatures in this scenario:
Member 1 sign the transaction and results in 11a0fffâŠ
Member 2 take 11a0fff⊠and sign it. He gets 22a0fffâŠ
At the same time member 3 take the same tx signed by member 1, 11a0fff⊠and sign it himself. He gets 33a0ffâŠ
Now member 2 and member 3 publish their correspondent transactions, 22a0fff, 33a0ff.
Now we have 3 diferent versions of that tx:
- 11a0fff⊠With signature of member 1. (total 1 of 5)
- 22a0fff⊠With signature of member 1 and 2. (total 2 of 5)
- 33a0ff⊠With signature of member 1 and 3. (total 2 of 5)
We donât have any transactions with the minimum 3 of 5, and we should since 3 of 5 members signed.
Only @Dhume, @cryptog left, the transaction from @mhps would already be valid, but lets sign it all to test.
