FLOT NSR Operations (buy side)

[ttutdxh]

That is the same key in hex format. Your WIF key is network-dependent. You can not load a NBT WIF private key on BTC, but you can using the one in hex format.

Just added a fix to make it clearer

[Dhume]

Ah okay that makes sense!

[cryptog]

Sorry for the delay.

Using validateaddress in QT gives:

{
“isvalid” : true,
“address” : “SZyTsyni7S9dePye78oABvVJ99b2ACdoCB”,
“ismine” : true,
“isscript” : false,
“pubkey” : “03686ee42f635c71c08f326e66139b6cb37167402cc0562584655aac03fe740495”,
“iscompressed” : true,
“account” : “”
}

[ttutdxh]

NSR provisional multisig address ready T63Z4xqKuYhWjharUQLYw2QxzQtkCXKtpc
Old provisional address. Update

[Dhume]

My motion has passed, seeing as the NBT group already seems settled in I’m assuming its best I join the NSR and BTC group?

My pub key: 02e2fcdfe246e9cd4864d9119b8af465487385eccd0ea30a8cb21d44d36818189f

[ttutdxh]

@Dhume should be in NSR group given that NBT group is already formed, so now there are 6 proponents for the NSR group. We are over the limit by 1 member.

As stated in their correspondent motions:

[Passed] Motion to join FLOT - mhps

@mhps is able to carry out a maximum one signing a week, with its required investigation, discussion and deliberation, and no more than three a month.

[Passed] Motion to join FLOT - jooize

@jooize will be able to respond to any request for signing within 48 hours of its proposal

[Passed] Motion to join FLOT - cryptog

@cryptog will be able to respond to any request for signing within 48 hours of its proposal

Rest of the members provide greater availability, so I think one of these tree members would have to be the less solicited for signing requests.
@mhps and @cryptog are not in NBT group, so they should be in the NSR one. That only leaves us @jooize.

What FLOT @cryptog, @Dhume, @dysconnect, @jooize, @masterOfDisaster, @mhps, @ttutdxh, @woodstockmerkle thinks?

[jooize]

I am very tired right now, so bear with me.

It appears the public key used for me in the NSR group is the same as for NBT, making it another address than the one I have control over. Never mind, it’s possible!

I see the value of using a seed now. Wish I had done it from the start.

Anyhow, the NSR group currently has one member too many, meaning I can leave the NSR group?

[masterOfDisaster]

I don’t care who’s in the group (I’m looking forward to work with each of them), but I’d rather have somebody resign than removing someone.

[jooize]

To form the group properly without @dhume and @crypto_coiner the NSR group needs to share 3 members with the NBT group. I can volunteer, but somebody else in @jooize, @ttutdxh and @woodstockmerkle may need to step up.

I can do it at least until more motions pass.

Well, I’m a perfect candidate for leaving since I joined NSR because there were insufficient people available at the time.

[ttutdxh]

I see the value of using a seed now. Wish I had done it from the start.

You can change your pubkey anytime with a proper reason. I expect we will ocassionally have to change individual pubkeys. Certainly, I will.

Múltiple reasons here: new cold storage solution, key compromised, starting to use HD keys, switching to the same seed for all networks like I do…

Edit: also if we use a seed for all of them (NBT, NSR, BTC and in a future PPC) we can create new addresses when needed without waiting for a new public key from each member. Even creating emergency addresses with the certainty of who will be authorized to sign them.

[ttutdxh]

So, @jooize do you volunteer to leave NSR group?

[jooize]

So, @jooize do you volunteer to leave NSR group?

Yes.

[ttutdxh]

Definitive FLOT NSR address T4cQwtThxdh8UWUy5XNPAwPfz73YuZAXqe: wrong @masterOfDisaster pubkey for NSR

Definitive FLOT NSR address SvtGbNjWE49pTM2TiUZrYKSNkxTJx75mmC

(Please check, double check again, and confirm)

[masterOfDisaster]

My pubkey is shown as 02a144af74d018501f03d76ead130433335f969772792ec39ce389c8a234155259 on cointoolkit. (btw - cointoolkit is awesome!)
This is the pubkey of the NBT address I posted here.

The NSR pubkey I posted here in this thread is:
03d05d8fb69fcd289548140dde8e906f6fc217b02477f81842f2483d9ea1c92425 I thought that one would be used for the NSR multisig address

[ttutdxh]

Fixed, I hope so.

[Dhume]

I signed the above NSR address after I verified, no message however appears. Is this correct? Also can we do a test transaction after the multi sig is created?

[ttutdxh]

What did you sign? I don’t follow.

I put 10 NSR into the address, lets make a test.

[Dhume]

No it was my misunderstanding, thought we had to sign to create the address. Let’s do a test transaction!

[ttutdxh]

Sent 2 NSR from FLOT SvtGbNjWE49pTM2TiUZrYKSNkxTJx75mmC to my address SdnvECf6HpfyXjAGuqwGkftWxxsaptBAKP.

FLOT @Dhume, @cryptog, @mhps, @masterOfDisaster lets see if we can all sign this transaction.
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
Transaction already signed by @ttutdxh.

[cryptog]

Apparently I could sign this tx with my private key corresponding to pubkey 03686ee42f635c71c08f326e66139b6cb37167402cc0562584655aac03fe740495 (NSR FLOT) using the Sign Transaction function of cointoolkit that gave me a green result: “Signed transaction
The above transaction has been signed:”