Receiver pays the fee
Benefits:
- makes NBT feel like cash and credit cards where the total you send = what is on the register
- could enable NBT to charge higher transaction fees on a nominal basis (peer-to-peer), but provide a “discount” to merchants who elect for their addresses to support the “receiver pays the fee” model
Potential implementation:
- merchant registers an address as “receiver pays”; this is held in the blockchain. This may require annual renewals or something.
- a different type of transaction denotes the ‘fee’ has not been paid, and that the receiver must do so
- minimum transaction amount for anti-dust
- maximum transaction size (in bytes) so a receiver doesn’t get burdened rolling up dust transactions
5 Likes
Shared content subscriptions
Enable subscriptions and microtransactions across multiple content providers
- Cross-community content passes are established i.e.: “$2.95 for 500 article views this month”
- User funds the subscription – and this could be done automatically by their wallet
- this transaction is recorded in the blockchain, but not yet settled
- To access content, user is presented with a challenge to “use a view”
- User’s wallet signs the challenge
- Content provider issues a transaction that places a claim against that user’s subscription for that month
- this transaction is recorded in the blockchain, but not yet settled
- At the end of the month, Nu distributes funds:
- For content creators, best case: 1 view = they get the full $2.95 of that users’ subscription. Worst-case is bounded at (example) $0.0059
- Nu Network takes a 1% cut by way of burning some NBT
- The node that does the distribution takes a cut of the lesser of $1.00 or 1% of the total subscriptions it is settling.
3 Likes