Sat Mar 12 10:38:24 UTC 2016
status of mOD dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
"buy" : 14374.45,
"sell" : 5809.8706
status of zoro dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo -A 2
"BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo" : {
"buy" : 14667.47,
"sell" : 11094.3206
status of Cybnate dual side PyBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquiditydetails B | grep B954pkUEdkeT1G5Lq14Cisij5no3RVxHYe -A 20 | grep poloniex -A 2
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:LiquidBits" : {
"buy" : 82.8175,
"sell" : 1866.6667
Because overall buy side liquidity was below 35% at 33%, I transferred 25 BTC to @masterOfDisaster’s gateway at Poloniex. This leaves 59.8 shareholder BTC in my possession.
The funds arrived and were automatically recognized by my NuBot.
###Resulting gateway fund situation:
Sat Mar 12 20:49:49 UTC 2016
status of mOD dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
"buy" : 24478.28,
"sell" : 5809.8706
status of zoro dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo -A 2
"BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo" : {
"buy" : 14532.26,
"sell" : 11094.3206
status of Cybnate dual side PyBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquiditydetails B | grep B954pkUEdkeT1G5Lq14Cisij5no3RVxHYe -A 20 | grep poloniex -A 2
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:LiquidBits" : {
"buy" : 592.97,
"sell" : 2000.0
The current liquidity situation taking the gateway funds into regard is:
You mean in Polo’s order book or Nu Client 's liquidityinfo?
We just checked the status of Nubots. NuLagoon is placing orders in Polo, but failed to submit liquidityinfo to Nu.
How could I possibly assign an order in the order book of Poloniex to NuLagoon?
Yes, I meant the broadcast liqudityinfo:
Might I ask how regularly check whether everything is running like it should?
Btw. - I still don’t find any liquidity broadcast from NuLagoon regarding liquidity at Poloniex.
Sun Mar 13 03:17:33 UTC 2016
nud getliquiditydetails B | grep "BTRnV9uLSPVJw4jn1JMV2Ki2cfFqPYip9o" -A 100 | grep polo -A 2
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:0.3.2a_1454163803748_1106ef" : {
"buy" : 0.0,
"sell" : 0.0
--
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:0.3.2a_1454167693921_6457fb" : {
"buy" : 0.0,
"sell" : 0.0
Do you use “BTRnV9uLSPVJw4jn1JMV2Ki2cfFqPYip9o” to broadcast?
I find it harder and harder to see a sufficient service provided by NuLagoon at Poloniex…
Why are no T1 buy orders reported?
Are they on the order book?
edit:
They are back for now:
nud getliquiditydetails B | grep BTRnV9uLSPVJw4jn1JMV2Ki2cfFqPYip9o -A 100 | grep poloniex -A 2 | tail -n 3
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:0.3.2a_1457865931788_81cb7a" : {
"buy" : 2143.6907,
"sell" : 1944.0947
It could because Nubot was moving buy/sell walls by canceling and resubmitting T1 orders. Maybe @deserver could help to confirm this.
NuLagoon is tend to be a little bit of prudent in operation on behalf of pools users. Recall the story of Mt.gox, we know that exchange default risk should never be forgotten or underestimated.
Keeping the Nubits pegging at $1 is our top1 piority. If the peg is in dangrous, we will not hesitate to provide as much liquidity as we could. Addtionly, there are motions regulating how NuLagoon provide liquidity support on behalf of Nu Shareholders. We will act accordingly.
Thank you very much for your service, but I need to say that there have been more occassions than I can count, at which the peg was solely kept by NuBots (and very recently a PyBot as well) that operated with Nu funds.
But I think the discussion fits better here:
I was originally focussing on ALP when I started that thread.
Maybe the view needs to be widened.
@henry: keep NuBot at Poloniex running and funded.
By design your MLP operation there should serve trading customers before the Nu funded NuBots/PyBot need to kick in.
I’m a NSR holder and first-time poster here . I’ve been watching the NuBits project since it’s beginnings on the Peercoin forum.
I’ve developed a real-time chart in Google Sheets that I use to monitor how well the peg is kept to $1.00 USD on the BTC/NBT pair on Poloniex. I figure it is relevant to this thread and would maybe help efforts in keeping track of the peg. It shows buyside liquidity that is at-or-above $0.99/NBT and sellside liquidity that is at-or-below $1.01/NBT. The price of BTC is also graphed, and is based on Bitfinex’s BTCUSD rate. Data are updated at least once per hour, and more frequently when the BTCUSD rate is changing rapidly.
I started tracking data at the end of January. Liquidity has declined dramatically since 3/13/16.
Nu-pool operations have stopped recently and abruptly as they ran out of funds before a new grant was obtained. Liquidity operations are now running on NuBots and a Pybot funded by FLOT.
There also appears to be some intermittent issues with NuLagoon’s NuBot on Poloniex, this requires further clarification and is being monitored by some in the community.
Short term, FLOT can increase the funds held on exchange increasing the risk profile of NuShareholders’ funds.
Passing of the grant for Nu-Pool on ALPv2 will probably provide some relief and hopefully more stable provisioning of liquidity due to the new reward model.
Clarification from NuLagoon is required about the apparently lower service levels recently.
