Maybe it’s not (only) due to technical reasons.
I have a hard time believing that all ALP clients fail for such a long period of time.
Yet, if the payment scheme were based on CRFC, the ALP participants had a stronger incentive to check their clients - just in case it’s really due to technical reasons and not economical ones
2016/01/31-04:29:28 INFO: starting PyBot for btc on poloniex
2016/01/31-04:29:29 ERROR: unable to delete all orders for btc on poloniex: Nonce must be greater than 2302733712049226. You provided 1454232570051.
2016/01/31-04:29:29 INFO: adjusting nonce of poloniex to 2301279479580
2016/01/31-04:29:29 INFO: successfully deleted all orders for btc on poloniex
2016/01/31-04:29:30 INFO: waiting 14.87 seconds to synchronize with other trading bots for btc on poloniex
Exception in thread Thread-3:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File “/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py”, line 551, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File “/root/alp-collection/python/trading.py”, line 342, in run
self.place_orders()
File “/root/alp-collection/python/trading.py”, line 273, in place_orders
manualshift = ast.literal_eval(self.shift)[‘manual’]
File “/usr/lib/python2.7/ast.py”, line 80, in literal_eval
return _convert(node_or_string)
File “/usr/lib/python2.7/ast.py”, line 79, in _convert
raise ValueError(‘malformed string’)
ValueError: malformed string
Yes I get this error on occasions but does not lead to [quote=“huafei, post:1464, topic:1239”]
2016/01/31-04:30:29 INFO: poloniex - balance: 0.00000000 rate: 0.00% ppm: 0.00000000efficiency: 0.00% rejects: 0 missings: 0 - xxxxx
[/quote]
Sat Mar 12 10:38:24 UTC 2016
status of mOD dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
"buy" : 14374.45,
"sell" : 5809.8706
status of zoro dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo -A 2
"BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo" : {
"buy" : 14667.47,
"sell" : 11094.3206
status of Cybnate dual side PyBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquiditydetails B | grep B954pkUEdkeT1G5Lq14Cisij5no3RVxHYe -A 20 | grep poloniex -A 2
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:LiquidBits" : {
"buy" : 82.8175,
"sell" : 1866.6667
Because overall buy side liquidity was below 35% at 33%, I transferred 25 BTC to @masterOfDisaster’s gateway at Poloniex. This leaves 59.8 shareholder BTC in my possession.
The funds arrived and were automatically recognized by my NuBot.
###Resulting gateway fund situation:
Sat Mar 12 20:49:49 UTC 2016
status of mOD dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
"buy" : 24478.28,
"sell" : 5809.8706
status of zoro dual side NuBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo -A 2
"BJs4YbtaqCmxeHLiR6zzjnZEotYVFAPfMo" : {
"buy" : 14532.26,
"sell" : 11094.3206
status of Cybnate dual side PyBot at Poloniex:
nud getliquiditydetails B | grep B954pkUEdkeT1G5Lq14Cisij5no3RVxHYe -A 20 | grep poloniex -A 2
"1:NBTBTC:poloniex:LiquidBits" : {
"buy" : 592.97,
"sell" : 2000.0
The current liquidity situation taking the gateway funds into regard is:
You mean in Polo’s order book or Nu Client 's liquidityinfo?
We just checked the status of Nubots. NuLagoon is placing orders in Polo, but failed to submit liquidityinfo to Nu.