Right so if in that median calculation the blue ‘21’ were a 100048572, the median would still be 14. The size of the number doesnt really matter, just whether it’s bigger or smaller than the current median.
Updating:
Added custodial grants:
BEuimmeoME52rKhiuiXvGBoTKP8r5fPwrp, 4760.00 NBT [accumulated nulagoon Custodian Fee - 17 Mar to 14 Apr 2016 ]
Modified Parking Rate:
Added a shorted interval: 11.4d --> 7.5%
What about voting for this: [Passed] Operator fee for masterOfDisaster dual side NuBot at Poloniex
…should be a no-brainer.
Updating:
Removed custodial grants:
BFRhngri9DLUnatcnhSJrZDk5J7u3Mhu5H, 440.0 NBT [passed]
BC84Af1QuytYF37yTd1hf34zRKnLWTJoTA, 750.0 NBT [passed]
BEuimmeoME52rKhiuiXvGBoTKP8r5fPwrp, 4760.0 NBT [passed]
Added:
B9gXptkoqAApF3AFrQyhUbhSzvuEudxupt, 90 NBT [6 days fee for masterOfDisaster dual side NuBot at Poloniex ]
392b89104ac63202baa11df9b4844db5f91532ed [nagalim proposal for NSR buyback/issuing threshold]
1 Like
Updating:
Removed custodial grants:
B9gXptkoqAApF3AFrQyhUbhSzvuEudxupt, 90 NBT [passed]
Lowered Parking Rate
Nu reserve for the Buy side has risen sufficiently
11.4d: 7.5 --> 5%
22.8d: 10 --> 6%
1.5m: 15 --> 7%
3m: 25 --> 8%
1 Like
Updating:
Removed:
392b89104ac63202baa11df9b4844db5f91532ed [passed]
Added custodial grants:
B5HupPg3ELbuaz4cuuGNoxREuVKJPZTToa, 4760.00 NBT [NuLagoon custodian fee request from 15 Apr to 12 May 2016 ]
BPyBotXoVMiAFWLwcxRpSntP9oe2NGYPtE , 129 [Dual-side passive PyBot for Poloniex and Bittrex ]
Added motions:
b59c750a307160b4f1cb5bedfd6027e17b5a0ab4 [Motion dual side NuBot gateway at Poloniex by masterOfDisaster]
f1a5bee323f6f3100e962ad41a0e9f9678930500 [Motion Dual side Nubot gateway in Poloniex @zoro - term 3 ]
f24470e836ed480b3b5a39c4a7c1fe7df111cf3d [Proposal for granting NBT to NuLagoon to create exchange-traded pool A, sub-funds BearBTC, BullBTC and build-in exchange ]
Park rates unchanged
1 Like
Announce: my voting data feed machine has had issues with the blockchain DL and has currently completed 80% of the DL after reboot. Apologizes for the inconvenience – I should be able to update the feed tomorrow
2 Likes
Any idea what motion regarding spread regulation you’re going to include (if any)?
Yes, probably: 1% Maximum Spread for ALP/MLP, Above 1% Allowed for Nu Funded Liquidity Operations (e.g. Gateways)
like I said I would here
1 Like
Thank you for your confidence in my understanding of liquidity provision!
lets see 
No problem.
This is a democracy and the majority rules.
The minority can either choose opposition or back out.
I announced what will happen, if either @Cybnate’s or @JordanLee’s motion passes.
My data feed wallet is back – thank you for your patience.
Updating:
Removed:
B5HupPg3ELbuaz4cuuGNoxREuVKJPZTToa, 4760.00 NBT [passed]
BPyBotXoVMiAFWLwcxRpSntP9oe2NGYPtE , 129NBT [passed]
b59c750a307160b4f1cb5bedfd6027e17b5a0ab4 [passed]
f1a5bee323f6f3100e962ad41a0e9f9678930500 [passed]
Added:
bd4d153bb5c2d8cd6013b77ad8780eabc7bae79e [@masterOfDisaster flexible spread according to LP type, pending a better model to be developed and proposed –
1% Maximum Spread for ALP/MLP, Above 1% Allowed for Nu Funded Liquidity Operations (e.g. Gateways) ]
BPACKiS7Q5wdishcEzabgXV8dRJJV1uXgt, 600NBT [high availability instance of nuexplorer by @backpacker with parking charting]
Raised parking rate: Buy Side is at water levels
11.4d: 15%
22.8d: 18%
1.5m: 21%
3m: 24%
3 Likes
Updating:
Added:
28ad569f5224884fc1247bd9a18bf96bf8b8f0ab
[Changing Spread for Passive Dual-Side Pybot for Poloniex and Bittrex] [not in conflict with 1% Maximum Spread for ALP/MLP, Above 1% Allowed for Nu Funded Liquidity Operations]
1 Like
Updating:
Added:
b71a585de0b5e552648036fbc8282e11fea4a1cc [@JordanLee motion:1% Maximum Spread in Shareholder Funded Liquidity Operations – original tight spread in original model]
c070f654c2ff3e43a10fc5ff1dbf8ad74e36b18f [@JordanLee motion to restore original LP model]
Removed:
bd4d153bb5c2d8cd6013b77ad8780eabc7bae79e [withdrawn support for MoD motion “1% Maximum Spread for ALP/MLP, Above 1% Allowed for Nu Funded Liquidity Operations (e.g. Gateways)” not to be in conflict with added supported motions]
28ad569f5224884fc1247bd9a18bf96bf8b8f0ab [withdrawn support for cybnate motion "Changing Spread for Passive Dual-Side Pybot for Poloniex and Bittrex " not to be in conflict with added supported motions]
BPACKiS7Q5wdishcEzabgXV8dRJJV1uXgt, 600.00NBT [passed]
Raised rate:
While we are restoring the peg, we want to reduce supply and reward hopefully correctly those who would have patiently waited
11.4 days: 75%
22.8 days: 75%
1.5 months: 75%
3.0 months: 75%
1 Like
Updating:
Added NSR grant:
Snvrc5q82wfe2NjEjaQAyStpPKseWrsNqn, 100000000 NSR [we need to sell many nushares to support the buy side and restore the 1USD peg]
Removed:
c070f654c2ff3e43a10fc5ff1dbf8ad74e36b18f [withdrawn by jordanlee – motion that was firing subjectively defined non uncorrect LPCs ]
Updating:
Added:
c54a165234d50c9df95367bae4e79d902e3344ab [Purchasing 415,000 NSR for 500NBT from crypto_coiner to buy back and support blind auction NSR#1]
Removed:
Snvrc5q82wfe2NjEjaQAyStpPKseWrsNqn 100000000 NSR [passed]
Updating:
Removed:
b71a585de0b5e552648036fbc8282e11fea4a1cc
[@JordanLee motion for 1% Maximum Spread in Shareholder Funded Liquidity Operations // now that competing motion from @masterOfDisaster 1% Maximum Spread for ALP/MLP, Above 1% Allowed for Nu Funded Liquidity Operations (e.g. Gateways) has passed]
1 Like
Updating:
Added:
8688c842023109881ad6a77bc8bdfe8f5c1704dc
[Voting] No Nu Liquidity Without a Revenue Model
f8b9e060dc73a97fd28a62ecfdd419114892787a
[Voting] Temporarily cap NBT supply with full reserve
Changed park rate:
The peg is broken and we should incentivize holders not to park so that we can burn asap and restore the peg within 2 months or 3 months, after which people can park again
11.4 days: 0%
22.8 days:0%
1.5 months:0%
3.0 months:15%
1 Like
Due to personal reasons (essentially work), I will refrain myself from providing a feed for an undetermined period of time, starting today. I suggest to subscribe to @cryptog feed, as I am now subscribed to his feed from now on.
1 Like