Your first reaction is to insult. That alone makes you unwelcome.
There’s a misunderstanding here that seems rooted in whether SouthXchange delisted NuBits entirely, not at all, or only removing the BTC pair. No, not because NBT was made USNBT.
Where did I use ‘simply’ when once again underlining how important focusing on USD pairs is for Nu?
Push your agenda. Remove my posts. Calling them false is not as easy as you appear to think.
This is what you do, all the time. You manage to misrepresent what someone meant in a way that makes a point of yours seem legitimate. You gather sympathy as the underdog and perpetuate a sense of malicious activity.
You didn’t say “simply”, no. Here’s what you said:
Is that not heavily implying what I meant you meant?
Keeping USD in a decentralized way is a major aim of our project. We can’t use our own product for that, unfortunately. The only ways I can see to hold real USD as reserve is to trust centralized exchanges or a custodian with collateral like NuSafe. Is that what you want Nu to do?
USD on decentralized exchanges is impossible. B&C Exchange won’t trade real USD. On centralized exchanges people would have to trade BTC for USD and then USD for USNBT unless exchanges agree to custom integration.
You’re making a point for an issue that isn’t necessarily significant. We’ll want to create automation for trading between multiple assets in order to keep maintenance of the cryptoasset reserve low when diversified.
Was that point in the previous quote not just attacking tier 6 in the liquidity model? Keeping USD doesn’t preclude holding BTC, if we would focus on USD.