Stability is not the hot button issue of crypto anymore. Governance is

CoinGame 2016-01-27 00:53:49 UTC #21

It’s so snarky, cheap, and easy to do. I love it.

tomjoad 2016-01-27 00:58:58 UTC #22

If you hash it, I’ll vote for it. I think it could be a fun way to illustrate just how powerful our blockchain governance can be.

masterOfDisaster 2016-01-27 06:35:55 UTC #23

Why not making a bit more than just that?
Bitcoin is torn apart by just the discussion about whether, how, when an how much to increase the block size.

Nu’s governance allows even more.

I mean, doubling the block size could be non-controversial. Still a marketing stunt. But I sense even more potential.
Let’s include a discussion regarding dynamic fees to it
Wouldn’t that be even more impressive?

Nagalim 2016-01-27 12:37:32 UTC #24

Not quite as cheap or fast, i grant you, but:
[Discussion] Variable Block Size

CoinGame 2016-01-27 12:44:31 UTC #25

Love the idea of voting on blocksize. Would like to hear @sigmike or @erasmospunk’s thoughts on the technical pitfalls involved.