You must have seen wrong instructions are clear as a day and far, far simpler than this: https://docs.nubits.com/nu-raspberry-minting/ .
Calling it command line literacy is stretching it, it is basic copy/paste.
On what kind of improvement are you referring to? As motion suggests NuShareholders are able to provide input on development with ideas and suggestions if they are retained in reasonable limits.
Long-term there is absolutely room for all kinds of improvement and I do have all kinds of ideas, however 4k is not going to cover it. We can discuss porting back all future changes from Peerbox to NuBox sometime in the future.
I have proposed this motion as an intro for our future collaboration, as @Sentinelrv has already understood in the comments above.
Don’t know what to expect honestly.[quote=“peerchemist, post:75, topic:3753”]
it is basic copy/paste.
[/quote]
Here is one idea:
Another one would be the ability to just start one interactive bash/command line script to make it as simple and foll proof as possible. More advanced is a nice GUI, but I can imagine that such a thing is at another level requiring more work.
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-version print Peerbox version.
-info equal to “ppcoind getinfo” with some extras
-balance print balance
-public show info with omitted private data
-stdout dump data to stdout, use to pipe to some other program
-health compare local blockchain data with ppc.blockr.io as
reference
-rates current average PPC exchange rates in USD and BTC
-start start Peerbox
-stop stop Peerbox
-autostart [AUTOSTART]
make Peerbox autostart at boot time
-tor start Peerbox with Tor
-restart restart Peerbox
-mint unlock Peercoin wallet for minting.
-addr shows all associated addresses.
-send [SEND [SEND …]]
send Peercoins; -send ADDRESS AMMOUNT
?
So you are basically proposing using peerbox utility trough ssh, which is in the window of your main rig.
That would be a very basic version, I was actually referring to a GUI. I know using SSH or any connection compromises security, but with the requirement to vote I think it is important for NuShareholders to have a simple interface.
My reasoning that with this scheme voting is quite simple.
I agree with you that mass adoption will require a gui, maybe something like this but implemented properly and with security in mind. However you must agree that this grant will not cover development of something like that specifically for Nu. It will have to be implemented for Peerbox first and than back-ported to Nu sometime in the future.
Such a Peerbox dashboard is indeed what I was looking for.
What would that add in terms of cost? Could you provide an estimate. I’m prepared to invest in Peerbox for Nu, but like to have an understanding where we end up in the imo ideal target state (with GUI).
I am not sure at this point. I can not promise anything and can not even propose some number which would cover development costs.
All I can say is that I will keep working on this as much as my other errands allow.
I’m prepared to invest in Peerbox for Nu, but like to have an understanding where we end up in the imo ideal target state (with GUI).
I will get there, easy. No need for direct investment.
However expanding Peerbox into Nu territory would help with user base and funding for continual development.
Peerbox was easier to install and get started (and much better security) than compiling yourself. I have tried both. The old peerbox was not so good if you want to tinker with things because of the controls of ppcoind were in many places and the OS was not mainstream. But the new peerbox is supposed to have better arranged controls and use raspbian. So I think nubox has its value and if peerchemist can offer a period of accepting limited feature-improvement request and it can be maintained it’s worth teh 4000 nbt cost.
Putting voting for this motion on hold until we have cleared our liquidity issue unfortunately :frowning or getting nubox should asap be a priority in order to have more nodes minting?
So an important questions is: what minting diff raise should we expect to get from NuBox?
I am not a wizard, there is no way to know that. It will depend on how well can Nu marketing use the fact that they have this product and what is the best way to present it to the masses. What I can see from the comments around here it seems that it will at least make it easy for existing RaspberryPi users.
However there is large untaped RaspberryPi community out there who might want to get into cryptocurrency in what is still non-orthodox ways compared to mining like providing liquidity, parking and minting.
Porting Peerbox to NuNet is just a start for a bunch of stuff this platform can do.
As for liquidity problems. It seems that NuBits volume is none to zero across exchanges due to unprecedented Bitcoin stability. I hope NuNet will survive this period.
If community agrees we can change this from grant to motion and I can get payment from FLOT reserves in form of Bitcoin or Peercoin. I guess that would save some sell pressure on the peg.
Impeding development saves some bucks, but prevents useful tools from being created.
I’d rather see an NSR sale than saving money here.
The liquidity operation costs a lot of money and there’s a lot of potential for saving, but that road isn’t followed seriously.
Why make cuts here instead?
This has the potential to increase minting.
Made the decision to add this to my datafeed at next opportunity even though the timing is not great. However given the liquidity situation I would like to see that you hold at least 50% in the custodial address if this passes until you have released NuBox. This would allow some spread in the liquidity which would be helpful. I’m fine with you just stating that so we don’t have to change the grant and start voting over again.
Here is my reasoning to support this grant:
NuBox gives shareholders the opportunity to mint more easy.
This enables a stronger and more secure network and hopefully results in more participation.
NuBox gives shareholders the opportunity to configure headless clients more easy
It will be a lot easier to configure voting for grants without just pointing to a datafeed. This will reduce the dependence on datafeeds which is a good thing imo.
NuBox makes it easier to run lightweight nodes
The number of nodes is low and needs to increase to make the network more resilient.
I also like to mention that I support cross-development between the Peercoin, NuBits and B&C community. Going forward we will need to sustain a healthy ecosystem for Nu. Each community is still too small to drive development entirely alone. Collaboration and re-use between the communities to some extent is therefore essential I believe. This is also the idea behind open-source. Let’s exploit what we have.
I am sorry, do we have a problem with language barrier here? I have clearly stated all what you have just asked in the OP and you could deduct the answer from the entire thread.
Just one last thing.[quote=“peerchemist, post:84, topic:3753”]
Porting Peerbox to NuNet is just a start for a bunch of stuff this platform can do
[/quote]
I would like to make it clear that although I support cross development between peercoin and nu and although I am grateful to peercoin, I think this grant regards first and foremost nu. In other words, it intends to foster the spreading of Nu, first and foremost. Of course, if it can help peer oin’s development as well, that would be great.
In the next few days I will start a “NuBox testing thread” which will serve as communication channel between me and community while I am implementing NuBox. There users will be able to advise and ask for features.
What needs to be done first is nubits package for Debian, and I will start by doing that, after it is doen porting peerbox utility and support packages will follow.
As promised I have kept 2k NBT back, by parking them for 25 days.
instructions are clear as a day and far, far simpler than this: https://docs.nubits.com/nu-raspberry-minting/ .