@assistant custodian vote B8DZADD7UrMkzEmTWyvn2cEoxcnog1D8MK
Hi @huafei
Here are the details for the Custodian Vote on B8DZADD7UrMkzEmTWyvn2cEoxcnog1D8MK:
##B8DZADD7UrMkzEmTWyvn2cEoxcnog1D8MK ###1350.00 NBT. Blocks: 4353 (43.530000%) Share Days: 1205364143 (41.544779%)
43.530000%
41.544779%
@woolly_sammoth, mustard much?
Edit: Passed according to my client and http://blockexplorer.nu/votes/success.
Hi @jooize
I couldn’t find the details for the Custodian Vote on B8DZADD7UrMkzEmTWyvn2cEoxcnog1D8MK:
This passed, and I’m now operating a fixed cost reward system with a large spread. I suggest people try out the parameters:
deviation = 0.0015
offset = 0.007 shift = 0.005
10nbt/day each side?
No, I made a mistake there cause I was caught up in the T4 stuff and both pools are paying 7.5. I’ll increase both pools tonight and do some manual payouts. (Away from computer at the moment)
Edit: Ok, updated. Both pools are running at 10 NBT/day.
I reduced the suggested shift to 0.005 because we have to think about the extreme case where everything in a custodian’s account is consumed at once. In that case the price will go from feed+offset-shift sell to feed-offset+shift buy. Therefore we want offset-shift>fee (0.002 on bter)