[Passed] NuPond Term 5 Fixed Cost Motion

NuShares Passed Grants
#61

Hi @huafei

Here are the details for the Motion Vote on 187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee:

##187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee
Blocks: 4542 (45.420000%)
Share Days: 1676818477 (51.467055%)

#62

almost pass, any news?

#63

Hi @huafei

Here are the details for the Motion Vote on 187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee:

##187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee
Blocks: 4957 (49.570000%)
Share Days: 1820662730 (56.015025%)

#64

Iā€™m hoping to do the switchover tomorrow night, begin Term 5 off of rollover funds and assume the grant will pass. Iā€™m excited for the simpler operator finances of fixed cost, if nothing else.

2 Likes
#65

@assistant motion vote 187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee

#66

Hi @cryptog

Here are the details for the Motion Vote on 187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee:

##187e547074c3fe0508a56d684dd705ec5d9929ee
Blocks: 5003 (50.030000%)
Share Days: 1819892052 (56.389974%)

#67

passed.

#68

what about the client bot we should use?

#69
#70

No difference to client. The switchover should be smooth and require no action on the part of the LP.

1 Like
#71

using old client or alp-collection from the githup?

#72

Whatever you want. If it runs on the old pool, it will run on the new pool. Iā€™m guessing Iā€™ll do the switchover in the next 2 hours or so (im not home from work yet)

#73

itā€™s working right? I think itā€™s working. Iā€™m having a hard time with the client side because bterā€™s being weird, but I think the server is running properly. Can i get some testers? 0.73% rate/day, this is not a test and will be paying out.

The rate is not recording properly on https://raw.nupool.net/nubits/ like I had hoped. @willy, I donā€™t really have time to fix this right now but will try to mend it over the weekend. Iā€™ll have to dig into how the server submits liquidity.

#74

which server address?
45.55.55.197:3333 not working now

#75

nupond.net:3334, the same as it was before the switch.

#76 
2015/10/07-23:35:00 INFO: bter - balance: 0.00029872 rate: 0.88% ppm: 0.00015083 efficiency: 100.00% rejects: 0 missings: 0 - btc - bid: 24.6750 x 0.88% - 81C5AE35-21D1-48F3-9F3D-24EA0A303194
2015/10/07-23:35:17 ERROR: unable to receive balance for btc on bter: exception caught: No JSON object could be decoded
2015/10/07-23:35:17 INFO: adjusting nonce of bter to 1
2015/10/07-23:35:48 ERROR: unable to receive balance for btc on bter: exception caught: No JSON object could be decoded
2015/10/07-23:35:48 INFO: adjusting nonce of bter to 1
2015/10/07-23:36:00 INFO: bter - balance: 0.00040287 rate: 0.38% ppm: 0.00006465 efficiency: 100.00% rejects: 0 missings: 0 - btc - bid: 24.6750 x 0.38% - 81C5AE35-21D1-48F3-9F3D-24EA0A303194
2015/10/07-23:37:00 INFO: bter - balance: 0.00046751 rate: 0.38% ppm: 0.00006465 efficiency: 100.00% rejects: 0 missings: 0 - btc - bid: 24.6750 x 0.38% - 81C5AE35-21D1-48F3-9F3D-24EA0A303194
2015/10/07-23:37:17 ERROR: unable to retrieve order book for btc on bter: exception caught: No JSON object could be decoded

alp-collection client

#77

Yah, youā€™re getting the json errors too. I donā€™t really know what thatā€™s about, but it looks like everythingā€™s working alright.

Ok, so term 5 began at ~3:30am GMT on October 8th with an account balance of 238.5235

#78

Before @willyā€™s https://raw.nupool.net/nubits/ can do similar things, would you mind giving a report of average monthly interest at nupond FC ALP once in a while so we know the spot market liquidity price rate?

#79

Basically, if the pool has less than 3,000 NBT liquidity on either side youā€™ll get a better rate putting your money there than on almost any other pool in the network.

The server logs record the rate just fine. Currently, 0.21%/day ask, 0.38%/day bid. 3542.6350 ask liquidity, 1984.6150 bid.

#80

Is the fixed cost server still running at

server=45.55.55.197:3333
unit=btc
exchange=bter

I canā€™t connect my bot to it. The connection failed at 2 a.m. (UTC).