[Passed] Motion proposal to give all votes the same weight

[mhps]

Why that? If this is true, why are we splitting the outputs in the first place?

so you always have many outputs minting at any time. in the extreme case if you could put all shares in one output, after finding a block all your shares will not be able to mint for 7 days.

less than 3.5 days to find a kernel, which will basically always be the case considering the coin supply and the block time.

i estimate that under current diff a 10k block needs about 30 days to find a block on average.

[creon]

so you always have many outputs minting at any time. in the extreme case if you could put all shares in one output, after finding a block all your shares will not be able to mint for 7 days.

I see, all this is just done to smooth voting. Thanks so much for all the info.

i estimate that under current diff a 10k block needs about 30 days to find a block on average.

Oh yeah, just missed a factor of 10 in the supply -.- OK now I understand why there is a global incentive to do that.

[creon]

i estimate that under current diff a 10k block needs about 30 days to find a block on average.

Sorry, one last question: I think the shareholder has an incentive to have the ability to make use of the full voting power for a particular motion. In order to achieve this at any time, all outputs should (in expectation) produce a block within each 10000 block window, which would correspond to an optimal chunk size of ~45k at the current difficulty. Is this correct?

[mhps]

i think it depends on the diff and how many shares you have in total. the same as in Asking for a low minting NuShares minimal

[creon]

Yes exactly, since 10000 blocks is also the min age (coincidence?) the optimal chunk size the smallest amount of shares that will meet the target within 1 block (in expectation). Thanks, I’ll play with the splitshareoutputs parameter to see how it behaves.