FLOT BKS Operations (buy side)

[mhps]

please proceed with the BKS multisig that is required for NuSafe

'What is the next thing to do?

[jooize]

I think we just need the inputs to send back the test amount we got, but since we had no block explorer and nobody with the client at the time, we stalled.

I’m synchronizing the blockchain at the moment.

[mhps]

I think we just need the inputs to send back the test amount we got, but since we had no block explorer and nobody with the client at the time, we stalled.

why not blindly send from the to-address for an amount smaller than the original sent amount less fees? if the tx got through the original sent tx must have worked.

[jooize]

Right, good point. I’ll go look in the thread again if we have the transaction ID.

We don’t. @Dhume: Do you have it? Or both. If I recall correctly there were two test transactions made. One to each address that was created (lexicographically ordered and not).

[cryptog]

I am ready to sign any valid tx.

[Nagalim]

We need @dhume’s pub key to make the 4-of-6 createmultisig and addmultisig rpc commands work right?

[jooize]

Dhume’s first address (FLOT PM)

There should be 1 BKS at the address.

addmultisigaddress 3 '["023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922", "0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07", "0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a", "034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff", "029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e"]'

9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r

listunspent 9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r

[
]

getreceivedbyaddress 9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r

0.0

Verify (redeem script).

---

masterOfDisaster’s first address

There should be 1 BKS at the address.

addmultisigaddress 3 '["034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff", "0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a", "0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07", "029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e", "023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922"]'

97vgjUf9ccmRoyuKRoJgaPAmPA4HhjQd1R

listunspent 97vgjUf9ccmRoyuKRoJgaPAmPA4HhjQd1R

[
]

getreceivedbyaddress 97vgjUf9ccmRoyuKRoJgaPAmPA4HhjQd1R

0.0

Verify (redeem script).

---

masterOfDisaster’s “To add some confusion” address (FLOT PM)

Lexicographically ordered 3-of-5 address.

There should be 1 BKS at the address.

If you use the createmultisig and addmultisig RPCs to generate the multisig address then you use “P2SH multisig” and the current limit is 1-of-12, 2-of-10, 3-of-8 or 4-of-6.

We need @dhume’s pub key to make the 4-of-6 createmultisig and addmultisig rpc commands work right?

As specified in my motion I will not partake as a signer for this address.

0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07

023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922

029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e

0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a

034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff

addmultisigaddress 3 '["0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07", "023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922", "029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e", "0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a", "034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff"]'

97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH

Verify (redeem script).

listunspent 97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH

[
]

getreceivedbyaddress 97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH

0.0

---

GitHub doesn’t force HTTPS by the way. We shouldn’t sign when served over HTTP.

[Dhume]

This was the transaction I send of 1 BKS.

8a5d9c19af910cc3b62faf97c554a78d1cb5d95c0c49013883061383b0243faa

[jooize]

If I understand that right, both outputs are singlesig addresses.

Try sending an insignificant amount to 97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH.

[Dhume]

Well the ammount was send to: 9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r but ended up in the address you see in the transaction ID. I’ve send 0.10 BKS to the address you mentioned.

[jooize]

Hmkay. Great! Could I have the transaction ID for that one as well?

[Dhume]

50238942412286665bbbbf8ed8c93da7eed1e39aa9fe83d9605194c6d6821229

[jooize]

View transaction.

I created a transaction …

010000003882965601291282d6c6945160d983fea99ae3d1eea73dc9d88ebfbb5b66862241428923500100000017a9142e66d5f1267690c3ca2fda49fe16a08dadea8f8187ffffffff0184030000000000001976a9147affc58b8f1ce9be5f09a399f36eb34eb2b9fe1b88ac0000000038

… but I can’t sign it.

[cryptog]

any update or any change?

[Dhume]

Not really, unfortunately we cannot use cointoolkit:

You can already craft a transaction, but you have to get the txid from the BKS wallet.

If https://bcblockexplorer.com/ tracked multisig, the same functionality as NBT and NSR could be added ASAP to Cointoolkit. I don’t know who is responsible for the BC explorer, but if anyone have access to it please fix it.
It is forked from the NBT explorer so I bet only changing the prefix for multisig should make it work (Two characters in the source code).

I asked for the explorer code to be open source but the responsible person was busy. He said he will be available after exams, so I don’t know how much it will take. I guess he is responsible for both explorers.

I’ve asked @Ben to contact @JetJet13 (Johny Georges) in the hope we can get this adaptation to the blockexplorer but so far I haven’t gotten any response. I have been busy myself with work commitments but I’ll will try to do some more digging next week to see if there is a way to make it work without using cointoolkit.

[JetJet13]

Hey @Dhume ,
I created and maintain the bc block explorer. I’ll gladly help you guys out. Let me know what you guys need from the explorer.

Cheers.

[Dhume]

Hey @JetJet13,

Good to hear from you! I’ve send you a PM.

[Dhume]

Small update, just had a meeting with @jetjet13 and @ttutdxh in which ttutdxh explained the problem we were having with BKS multisig on Cointoolkit. To my understanding @jetjet13 understands the problem and what needs to be changed. A solution appears to be in sight so we should be able to get BKS multisig working with Cointoolkit soon!

[masterOfDisaster]

Sounds great!
If Nu wants to scale while being able to manage the risk, NuSafe and alike are really desperately needed - that’s a need BCE won’t be able to fill…

[masterOfDisaster]

@CoinGame, can you please make the OP wiki style? Should be the last one for now.