FLOT BKS Operations (buy side)

'What is the next thing to do?

1 Like

I think we just need the inputs to send back the test amount we got, but since we had no block explorer and nobody with the client at the time, we stalled.

Iā€™m synchronizing the blockchain at the moment.

why not blindly send from the to-address for an amount smaller than the original sent amount less fees? if the tx got through the original sent tx must have worked.

Right, good point. Iā€™ll go look in the thread again if we have the transaction ID.

We donā€™t. @Dhume: Do you have it? Or both. If I recall correctly there were two test transactions made. One to each address that was created (lexicographically ordered and not).

I am ready to sign any valid tx.

We need @dhumeā€™s pub key to make the 4-of-6 createmultisig and addmultisig rpc commands work right?

Dhumeā€™s first address (FLOT PM)

There should be 1 BKS at the address.

addmultisigaddress 3 '["023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922", "0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07", "0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a", "034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff", "029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e"]'
9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r
listunspent 9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r
[
]
getreceivedbyaddress 9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r
0.0

Verify (redeem script).


masterOfDisasterā€™s first address

There should be 1 BKS at the address.

addmultisigaddress 3 '["034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff", "0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a", "0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07", "029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e", "023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922"]'
97vgjUf9ccmRoyuKRoJgaPAmPA4HhjQd1R
listunspent 97vgjUf9ccmRoyuKRoJgaPAmPA4HhjQd1R
[
]
getreceivedbyaddress 97vgjUf9ccmRoyuKRoJgaPAmPA4HhjQd1R
0.0

Verify (redeem script).


masterOfDisasterā€™s ā€œTo add some confusionā€ address (FLOT PM)

Lexicographically ordered 3-of-5 address.

There should be 1 BKS at the address.

addmultisigaddress 3 '["0234139729dd413c84a71a0bfd6f236790be861b37311cef3240277c940e4b0c07", "023c41edc461814e825a0847f9031fddf9b2610bb91992724920107f5fd07b4922", "029684f165042b44197bce605d81e3e9b22acb8ae677ea4ea3412307b3ff26ea6e", "0304571109f4e9dd3ce67133df452375597d20f583894cdd8ed09c65a3a3e3be5a", "034b0bd0f653d4ac0a2e9e81eb1863bb8e5743f6cb1ea40d845b939c225a1a80ff"]'
97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH

Verify (redeem script).

listunspent 97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH
[
]
getreceivedbyaddress 97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH
0.0

GitHub doesnā€™t force HTTPS by the way. We shouldnā€™t sign when served over HTTP.

This was the transaction I send of 1 BKS.

8a5d9c19af910cc3b62faf97c554a78d1cb5d95c0c49013883061383b0243faa

If I understand that right, both outputs are singlesig addresses.

Try sending an insignificant amount to 97zQy9VWLYcM6BeYGBv7bEJpRdxAy5cvEH.

Well the ammount was send to: 9CXZXhnhp8HBx12Zr6JJmJmTm8qQWrsR6r but ended up in the address you see in the transaction ID. Iā€™ve send 0.10 BKS to the address you mentioned.

Hmkay. Great! Could I have the transaction ID for that one as well?

50238942412286665bbbbf8ed8c93da7eed1e39aa9fe83d9605194c6d6821229

View transaction.

I created a transaction ā€¦

010000003882965601291282d6c6945160d983fea99ae3d1eea73dc9d88ebfbb5b66862241428923500100000017a9142e66d5f1267690c3ca2fda49fe16a08dadea8f8187ffffffff0184030000000000001976a9147affc58b8f1ce9be5f09a399f36eb34eb2b9fe1b88ac0000000038

ā€¦ but I canā€™t sign it.

any update or any change?

1 Like

Not really, unfortunately we cannot use cointoolkit:

Iā€™ve asked @Ben to contact @JetJet13 (Johny Georges) in the hope we can get this adaptation to the blockexplorer but so far I havenā€™t gotten any response. I have been busy myself with work commitments but Iā€™ll will try to do some more digging next week to see if there is a way to make it work without using cointoolkit.

2 Likes

Hey @Dhume ,
I created and maintain the bc block explorer. Iā€™ll gladly help you guys out. Let me know what you guys need from the explorer.

Cheers.

1 Like

Hey @JetJet13,

Good to hear from you! Iā€™ve send you a PM.

Small update, just had a meeting with @jetjet13 and @ttutdxh in which ttutdxh explained the problem we were having with BKS multisig on Cointoolkit. To my understanding @jetjet13 understands the problem and what needs to be changed. A solution appears to be in sight so we should be able to get BKS multisig working with Cointoolkit soon!

2 Likes

Sounds great!
If Nu wants to scale while being able to manage the risk, NuSafe and alike are really desperately needed - thatā€™s a need BCE wonā€™t be able to fillā€¦

2 Likes

@CoinGame, can you please make the OP wiki style? Should be the last one for now.