@sigmike, personally I love the federalism than centralization system because the former is more active. Do you know why Japan outperforms China since 1000AD? It seems off topic but actualy relavant. My opinion is relative loose system has more freedom to compete and “trial and error”. Something like biological evolution: a species with more gene mutation will evolve better.
If some shareholders want to add Ethereum Classic, some may disagree and perhaps motion stopped at 40% supporting. Why not build many isolate rooms and let some people try. The competition among rooms will provide versatile assets and lower fee for our customers. Ultimately leading to a flourishing B&C ecosystem.
Room1: 15signers, BTC, LTC. XPM, ETC… 0.1%fee
Room2: 9 signers, ETH, DASH,BTC… 0.08% fee
Room3: 12 signers, USDT, PPC, BTC …0,09% fee
Within one room, signers will agree with the fee level, crypto asset, and other things.
The first step is voting for hundreds of eligible signers so that every shareholder can be a signer.