oh, they are amateur programmers if so.
One ethereum blockchain handle all business? Sounds not very good approach. I like the “distributed” style.
I think you need to advertise the difference between B&C and OT/Ethereum on bitcointalk forum to get more investors. Bring up a white paper/ppt to demonstrate the pros and cons, if an argument occurs, more people are interested because nowadays the bitcointalk thread participants are mainly from PPC/Nu community.
Agree with that the Liability = sold NBT.
The asset of Nu should include software, computer(hardware) of NSR miners and the BTC/FIAT/NBT held in LPCs’ hands. Some LPCs bring their own money(BTC) to provider liquidity, those BTC/FIAT/NBT is both Nu’s liability and asset, ie no impact on equity. But their comission/reward(such as 7.5%/month), is Nu’s expenditure. Those expenditure weakens equity continuously. We need find ways to compensate the expenditure, and make equity positive, othewise the Nu’s equity will be always negative. If Nu business cannot make profit, the market capitalization of NSR is nothing, worth nothing.
I think it’s not difficult to report the finacial status of Nu DAC, how many NBT sold(not in LPC’s hands)? How many BTC/NBT on buy/sell wall(in LPC hands)? How many NBT burned as transaction fee? etc… I even imagine in future people can print/export to CSV format of the finacial report of Nu just by clicking wallet’s menus.
As long as we manage the equity positive and even increase the equity, Nu is not ponzi at all because this system can last long, from this day, to the end of people’s days. 
