Since consensus would need to be reached in either case (albeit quicker, but less trusted) and you prefer the alternative anyway, I suggest FLOT sends funds to zoro and you withdraw to FLOT when reported arrived.
That’s the formally corrrect way, which I prefer. Thank you for providing feedback!
Status of the former gateways at 2016-02-07, 17:54 UTC
I started the decommissioning of my NuBots, because @zoro’s NuBot is operational and funded and I will be away for two weeks.
Important notice:
The NuBots I operated are out of order as I can’t monitor them until further notice. I will try to have one on active standby for emergencies only. If I manage that, there will be an update in the respective thread.
BTC rate: $376
Sun Feb 7 17:54:56 UTC 2016
Account activity (former) sell side gateway:
11.48455135 BTC withdrawn to 3HikFkS2Zinab1TJq7dqp6wSPyLu7i7bhe (valued $4,306)
7270.60902936 NBT withdrawn to BqyRzFtWXDmjxrYpyJD42MLE5xc8FrB4js
Because blockexplorer.nu is stuck again, here an alternative link for the NBT withdrawal.
Account activity (former) buy side gateway:
28.00971846 BTC withdrawn to 3HikFkS2Zinab1TJq7dqp6wSPyLu7i7bhe (valued $10,531)
1719.91357486 NBT withdrawn to BqyRzFtWXDmjxrYpyJD42MLE5xc8FrB4js
Because blockexplorer.nu is stuck again, here an alternative link for the NBT withdrawal.
-
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 0.0,
“sell” : 0.0 -
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 0.0,
“sell” : 0.0 -
both former gateways combined
0 NBT
0 BTC (valued $0)
’-------
$0 total account value ($23,826 in total withdrawn)