Status of the former gateways at 2016-01-26, 17:40 UTC
BTC rate: $394
former sell side gateway
5,226 NBT on sell side
32.8 BTC on buy side (valued $12,923)
former buy side gateway
8,095 NBT on sell side
44.9 BTC on buy side (valued $17,690)
both former gateways combined 13,321 NBT 77.7 BTC (valued $30,613)
’------- $43,934 total account value
A deposit of some NBT to the former sell side gateway might be appropriate (especially when looking at the low ALP volume at Poloniex sell side).
If any NSR holder agrees, he/she might prepare a transaction using Cointoolkit and paste it in the relevant FLOT thread.
No need for pinging, though in my opinion. The time for permanent emergencies seems to be over thanks to the NuBots and the ALP regaining strength.
I’m not going to monitor the liquidity situation closely until furter notice.
If there’s a transaction to be signed, I’ll do it, if I don’t sense a conflict.
I’m not going to monitor the liquidity situation closely until furter notice.
If there’s a transaction to be signed, I’ll do it, if I don’t sense a conflict.
Status of the former gateways at 2016-01-29, 18:05 UTC
BTC rate: $377
former sell side gateway
3,829 NBT on sell side
36.6 BTC on buy side (valued $13,798)
former buy side gateway
0 NBT on sell side
38.2 BTC on buy side (valued $14,401)
both former gateways combined 3,829 NBT 74.8 BTC (valued $28,199)
’------- $32,028 total account value
I’m not going to monitor the liquidity situation closely until furter notice.
If there’s a transaction to be signed, I’ll do it, if I don’t sense a conflict.
Status of the former gateways at 2016-01-30, 13:10 UTC
BTC rate: $377
former sell side gateway
4,190 NBT on sell side
36.6 BTC on buy side (valued $13,798)
former buy side gateway
1,677 NBT on sell side
33.8 BTC on buy side (valued $12,742)
both former gateways combined 5,867 NBT 70.4 BTC (valued $26,540)
’------- $32,407 total account value
I’m not going to monitor the liquidity situation closely until furter notice.
If there’s a transaction to be signed, I’ll do it, if I don’t sense a conflict.
I’ve decided to make the accounting easier by taking the amounts form the broadcast liquidity - btw. everybody can do that
Status of the former gateways at 2016-01-31, 00:44 UTC
BTC rate: $378
Sun Jan 31 00:44:08 UTC 2016
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 13439.0,
“sell” : 4183.0751
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 12740.17,
“sell” : 1679.2886
both former gateways combined 5,862 NBT 69.2 BTC (valued $26,179)
’------- $32,041 total account value
Status of the former gateways at 2016-02-01, 19:02 UTC
12,000 NBT were deposited to the NuBot accounts
BTC rate: $372
Tue Feb 2 19:02:04 UTC 2016
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 8439.72,
“sell” : 16075.8356
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 11649.82,
“sell” : 7652.7734
both former gateways combined 23,727 NBT 54 BTC (valued $20,088)
’------- $43,815 total account value
Status of the former gateways at 2016-02-02, 20:11 UTC
BTC rate: $372
Tue Feb 2 20:11:42 UTC 2016
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 8446.52,
“sell” : 16075.8356
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 11659.2,
“sell” : 7652.7734
both former gateways combined 23,727 NBT 54 BTC (valued $20,105)
’------- $43,832 total account value
Status of the former gateways at 2016-02-03, 20:20 UTC
BTC rate: $370
Wed Feb 3 20:20:05 UTC 2016
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 9860.75,
“sell” : 14609.026
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 13578.79,
“sell” : 5652.7734
both former gateways combined 20,261 NBT 63.3 BTC (valued $23,438)
’------- $43,699 total account value
Status of the former gateways at 2016-02-04, 21:30 UTC
BTC rate: $387
Thu Feb 4 21:30:44 UTC 2016
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 8443.89,
“sell” : 16462.5445
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 12152.9,
“sell” : 7671.5943
both former gateways combined 24,133 NBT 53.2 BTC (valued $20,595)
’------- $44,728 total account value
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 5311.57,
“sell” : 6462.5345
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 4779.38,
“sell” : 7671.5943
both former gateways combined 14,133 NBT 26.2 BTC (valued $10,090)
’------- $24,223 total account value ($20,395 less than yesterday because of the withdrawals)
Status of the former gateways at 2016-02-06, 21:32 UTC
BTC rate: $374
Sat Feb 6 21:32:26 UTC 2016
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 4309.89,
“sell” : 7273.609
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 6581.83,
“sell” : 5647.5302
both former gateways combined 12,920 NBT 29.1 BTC (valued $10,890)
’------- 23,810$ total account value
I’d like to empty the Poloniex accounts on which the NuBots operate. I’d like to do that latest end of tomorrow UTC.
If the FLOT thinks @zoro’s account on which his NuBot operates on POloniex should be funded before I empty my accounts, it’s about time to send funds there.
Yes I think it is important to start the operations on @zoro FLOT gateway before you have stopped completely yours in order to make the transition smooth and guarantee some liquidity support on Polo.
So I would be fine with sending 10 btc to the buy side now.
I have running nubot in windows for over a month now and i am very confident with it. My only concern is stability but since i monitor it as much as possible i am ready to go!
I prefer a small amount of funds at least at the start.
While it creates additional effort for FLOT I’d rather withdraw all to FLOT and fund @zoro’s account from FLOT.
In the end it’s the same.
If there’s “forum consensus” of FLOT members that I can transfer 5,000 NBT and 13 BTC to @zoro’s account and withdraw the remainder to FLOT addresses, I’m fine with that.
Since consensus would need to be reached in either case (albeit quicker, but less trusted) and you prefer the alternative anyway, I suggest FLOT sends funds to zoro and you withdraw to FLOT when reported arrived.
The NuBots I operated are out of order as I can’t monitor them until further notice. I will try to have one on active standby for emergencies only. If I manage that, there will be an update in the respective thread.
status of (former) sell side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv -A 2
"BETwD8nSjtj9ADSvej2na34xmsMYwPRymv" : {
“buy” : 0.0,
“sell” : 0.0
status of (former) buy side gateway:
nud getliquidityinfo B | grep BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP -A 2
"BFGMPykfKxXZ1otrCZcsbnTwJjKHPP9dsP" : {
“buy” : 0.0,
“sell” : 0.0
both former gateways combined 0 NBT 0 BTC (valued $0)
’------- $0 total account value ($23,826 in total withdrawn)
