I don’t understand how anyone can say otherwise.
He did reply the same day you posted the second version.
Many seem not to believe in what’s been explained before all over the place, with the opinion that Nu needs to be profitable right now to exist.
I want to make the model more understood. There’s only so much time, and way too much is spent on these accusations lately.
At least some of these later did not appear to be him. Show us what you mean.
Where? What is the evidence? It doesn’t affect my stance, but include it to remove all doubt. Do you also believe he’s majority owner of B&C Exchange?
Agreed, sometimes. Mostly I see others attack him and occasionally me that way without solid backing.
@ConfusedObserver runs around this forum looking for anything he can find that’s not handled exactly as should have been.
@ConfusedObserver joined 2016–06–08. The day of @masterOfDisaster’s last post before his return two weeks later (until leaving same month) with:
@ConfusedObserver later bumped that thread.
@ConfusedObserver’s writing style is similar in multiple ways with @masterOfDisaster’s. Look at what they talk about. Analyse their use of ellipsis, dash, quotation marks, and emojis.
Tell me that you think @ConfusedObserver is not @masterOfDisaster. To me it’s as obvious as @Phoenix being @JordanLee.
@masterOfDisaster was unprofessional in responding to the criticism against his actions. Cheekily put up the proceeds from the single NuShare sale for NuBit customers at 90% devaluation.
Then he stole 13 BTC.
He did give his rationale for what you refer to as unauthorized transactions.
Funneling of initial B&C Exchange shares or later the funds and the trading with it. Dishonest or theft if true, and the latter a breach of trust but arguably defensible.
In regard to the viability of the Nu model or safety for future NuBit holders, whom you’re primarily concerned about, those offenses are not very significant.
I concur with this entire earlier post:
