I read that as
@henry needs to confirm that as it is only my interpretation.
I have a general question:
wouldn’t it be more fair for NuLagoon and Nu to provide @henry with custodian grants in advance?
This discussion was once held and I want to start it again.
@henry has shown that NuLagoon runs well and is managed soundly. Still he depends on the will of NSR holders to pay him after the service has been delivered and compensation to pool participants has been paid.
I don’t expect NSR holders to go mad and not vote for the custodial grant.
But I’d recommend a custodian grant in advance of the service. NBT that were granted in excess could be burned or charged against following grants.
The reasoning is simple:
in my opinion the effect of such a grant having trouble to pass (because new NSR holders don’t feel obliged to stick to decisions previous NSR holders did make) would be far worse than if the risk Nu needs to face when granting in advance did come true.
The TLLP grants (as well as other grants) are in advance as well.
I don’t understand why it should be different for NuLagoon.