[Passed] NuRiver Cryptsy Month 2 Operations

[nmei]

USD withdrawal is a different beast on Cryptsy. It’s not the simple 0.5%…I can speak from experience. Once you have USD you’re stuck unless you do one of 3 things.

1. Change to BTC, which carries a 3%+ cost due to the illiquid premium market
2. Withdraw to another e-wallet that you have to setup which is more hassle and a 1% fee. Not to mention the wire fees after that.
3. Withdraw to a physical check which takes 3-5 business days to get to you

SO, USD on cryptsy is a hassle. Passing the 3% to the end user saves Nu network from the cost. Plus 3% is comparable to the BTC/USD premium that they are already paying. I’d be willing to lower it to 2% though, but the motion is out???

[Nagalim]

But both the LP and the end user have to pay the USD withdrawal, and that is not really unique to Cryptsy. We are trying to provide a service such that users with USD don’t have to pay that very fee, but can instead trade for USD and withdraw that. The LPs are paid by Nu enough to offset the withdrawal fee if they are trying to rebalance. Maybe not, like I said it’s an interesting perspective and I’m not completely convinced it’s wrong, I just question the efficiency of it. You can try to pass this grant as is for a test run if you like. Besides, maximizing the offset is not necessarily the best LP strategy and you may find your LPs using offsets significantly less than the allowed tolerance. It’s an interesting experiment, for sure.

[zoro]

an experiment indeed. the usd in cryptsy has more difficulties since you have to be authenticated with a picture and official documents. Cryptsy lacks the different authentication levels that other exchanges have!

p.s. i see a “big” rise in BTC’s value but NU’s buy side is not shrinking, i wonder!

[nmei]

We will see.

I can tell you there are only 2 providing USD liquidity - and I am one. And there is no NBT. I’m not compensated by Nu enough to re-balance as it stands, which is why everything is setting in USD. It would take ~15 days to make 3% to cover the cost of making the USD -> BTC -> NBT re-balance. Or wait the 5-7 days for a check and then use coinbase BTC -> NBT.

[Nagalim]

I see, basically every alt-coin on cryptsy is trading for more than the coinmarketcap average. Maybe you should consider modifying the price feeds to have a local offset, such that NBT is worth $1.01 instead of $1, then have a smaller tolerance. This is equivalent to an asymmetric tolerance. It would require a change in both the client and the server and would result in something like a buy wall at $1 and a sell wall at $1.02. This would not require any change to the BTC pool, only the USD pool.

The fundamental issue here is that if NBT had existed when cryptsy started operation it wouldn’t have gotten this bad. But as is, you’re basically attempting to provide an arbitrage gateway for the entire exchange.

I can hard code some changes to the client, but it would break the other pools unless I do some labor intensive wiring out of parameters. I can easily make you a branch of my github specifically for NuRiver NBT/USD though.

[cryptog]

I suggest we hold a bit supporting liquidity operations on cryptsy given their unclear situation.
Plus we have already a good liquidity scattered over several exchanges, I am feeling:{“blocks”:561218,“buy”:113501.0792,“sell”:119643.7158}

EDIT: Well the more liquidity the better although we should limit the costs.

[Cybnate]

Supporting this as it is a relatively small grant and still partially experimental given the issues we have seen on Cryptsy.
I think it is good to have good, but small liquidity spread over many exchanges over having 1 or 2 major ones.

[Cybnate]

[nmei]

I re-applied because I thought the consensus agreed with Cybnate: solid small spread over many exchanges is the goal.
This is only ~354 NBT compared to the thousands spent on the other LPs.
And to address your concerns I won’t look to raise limits and look to decrease rates next month.

[cryptog]

Got it. Makes sense. Will vote for it very soon.

[cryptog]

3f252703ed50366011110a827bceb6fab1494685 verified

and

Custodial Address: BSQSc3WSCxyGUSqETCo8zceADeqx3Dq33x
Amount Requested: 354 NBT

voted

[crypto_coiner]

Custodial Address: BSQSc3WSCxyGUSqETCo8zceADeqx3Dq33xAmount Requested: 354 NBT

ok -voted

[CoinGame]

[Nagalim]

@nmei what are your plans for a logo and website?

[nmei]

Simple website with just the HowTo to get going on the LP.
I have no idea on a logo except the water theme. Any ideas?

[Nagalim]

Get a graphic designer for your logo, shareholders will pay (~$100-150).

[willy]

Yes, NuPool hired a designer as well. We paid him from the operator fees, not through a separate grant.

[zoro]

i guess this has passed.

“BSQSc3WSCxyGUSqETCo8zceADeqx3Dq33x” : {
“354.00” : {
“blocks” : 5044,
“block_percentage” : 50.44,
“sharedays” : 1707941095,
“shareday_percentage” : 54.89733333

edit:
no guessing, i see it also in nu wallet

[masterOfDisaster]

confirmed

nud getinfo | grep blocks
    "blocks" : 573277,
nud getcustodianvotes | grep BSQSc3WSCxyGUSqETCo8zceADeqx3Dq33x -A 6
    "BSQSc3WSCxyGUSqETCo8zceADeqx3Dq33x" : {
        "354.00" : {
            "blocks" : 5044,
            "block_percentage" : 50.44,
            "sharedays" : 1705623033,
            "shareday_percentage" : 54.85163566
        }

[nmei]

Servers have been switched to the new values.

Concerning the USD pair…Cryptsy usd volume and price is coming back in line. So I do not expect to keep the spread on the pair next month.

Best wishes.