Sam and I are trying to get a 60 day period in our current grant. It’s going slower than ever, but I am confident it will pass this week.
Same for LiquidBits, the latest grant request is for 60 days.
On-topic: Supporting this, will be interesting to see. Although the minting rate is going up again indicating more potential awareness. Maybe it was just a late ‘Summer Holiday dip’.
In my case it is the language problems, why I can not vote. The technical terms making no sense for me. I would prefer it if everything is translated. Or people like me could collect terms that you should translate. For example: Draft or Motion is for me the same like a proposal. And i dont understand, why i should give a vote for a proposal or something to discuss. It would take someone who knows exactly what is meant by the definition.
This motion has been hashed and voting has begun:
0940e0d267939f84c295731043dd6c95c005516a
This is an importabt test. This test howevery won’t catch votes from shareholders who pay attention but only vote when feeling they must.
0940e0d267939f84c295731043dd6c95c005516a verified and voted.
voted
If you want this to have a better response then it should be posted to Nu’s Reddit, Twitter and Facebook, unless you only want to see who is paying attention to the main forum.
Look at http://blockexplorer.nu/motions to see how the response already looks like…
it has the same response as the current ALP grants! it seems that most shareholders “follow” some “experts” in voting
78 votes in the past 100 blocks.
The POS difficulty has increased a lot. If it is largely due to this motion, it means that 1 many shareholders don’t mint when they don’t vote. 2 many don’t vote often.
95 votes in the past 100 Blocks! At least 95% of the shareholder who mint know about this motion.
That’s not necessarily true. Statistical fluctuation is especially powerful when voters can choose to hold back their votes for extra ooph. Still, this motion has had over 80% support with a serious amount of consistency.
It will be interesting to see what percentage this motion reaches after a week or two. A 95% response rate would be fantastic, whereas I think 80% would indicate that we have a significant block of apathetic voters who aren’t even willing to spend 15 seconds configuring a data feed.
Assuming all voting shareholders are voting now, according to current measurement there are 400 milliion shares mint or vote at all, and there are about 200 million minting shares (they may or may not vote).
Whatever happened with this? I don’t see it listed in the voting sticky and I can’t find it on NuExplorer.
it passed I got 80-95% shareholder participation.
