A custodial* grant does seem to make more sense in ensuring shareholder satisfaction is honored, but(?) it also puts more pressure on shareholders to follow through. Is it possible to have multiple voting feeds? Thinking if shareholders were to trust someone else to make the judgement for them.
A single motion encompassing payment to FLOT members may be useful, but still, how will shareholder satisfaction be honored? Should those who believe in terminating a member put up a motion, and it be assumed the member’s continued service is desired unless such a motion passes? Doesn’t sound unreasonable to me.
* Is it custodian or custodial? I still don’t understand this. Custodian vote, custodial grant? I’d like some clarity. A custodian is voted in by a custodial grant?
