changed as well
Not volatility but trading volumes. The other at risk is BTC but its large volume on the order books makes the exploit less useful
voting for 1ce96336ac866c29cbcbf0908b0752b0065a3af4
I also support Jordan’s proposal. I’m not sure that the reduced liquidity is a sufficient safeguard, but it certainly helps.
1ce96336ac866c29cbcbf0908b0752b0065a3af4
voted
another question, should I cancel the old vote(eg.kiara’s dividend) which already executed?
BTW, plz add a comment space aside the hash in our GUI, I forget which is which.
EDIT: and add the link to status of vote so that we can easily find the voting result.
2 Likes
I need this too
And if we can keep track of motions results, with labels and links to their threads in the voting tap it would be great 
Also a link field in the Elected Custodians table would be great, i can’t find the proposal that got 4M NBT to read it.
It’s worth nothing that withdrawing custodial support from NBT/PPC and NBT/BTC will force volume to move to NBT/USD.
Say there is only custodial support for NBT/USD
If you want to purchase NBT, then you will get hit with a bid/ask spread if you purchase NBT directly using BTC or PPC. You can minimize this slippage by first converting BTC to USD and then converting USD to NBT. This will lead volume to shift from NBT/PPC,NBT/BTC to NBT/USD.
tl;dr; You cannot wait for volume in the NBT/USD market to develop before withdrawing custodial support. If you don’t withdraw support from NBT/PPC and NBT/BTC, then the NBT/USD market will never develop (or at least not for a very long time).
3 Likes
This motion is nearly passed. It has exceeded 4500 of the past 10000 blocks, and is continuing to climb. @KTm may wish to start considering the best way to fulfill it. Note that the motion mandates that any trades occur on CCEDK.
This motion has tapered off at 46.5% of the past 10000 blocks. If you would like to support this motion, please add the motion hash, 1ce96336ac866c29cbcbf0908b0752b0065a3af4, to the Motions window inside the Vote tab of your Nu client.
You may prefer to take no action or remove the hash, if you are against this motion.
Thank you!
1 Like
I believe this is caused by a big drop of minting shares in the last few days. The minting difficulty is dipping to the lowest point since late August according to http://blockexplorer.nu/charts/posdiff
I can only guess that the drop is caused by many shares have moved, e.g. to new shareholdeers from Jodan and to the exchange when there is a big move in the market.
The undistributed shares held by Jordan aren’t minting, so your second guess is a more likely cause.
Would it be possible to increase margins on more volatile coins like PPC?
Also one problem with Jordan’s proposal is that the price could have slipped a lot by the time you choose to balance.
I now support @Chronos original motion to cease PPC operations.
After last weeks of trading activity I am more convinced that our long-term direction should be stopping providing liquidity on risky pairs. PPC is without doubt currently the more risky : low liquidity.
Instead of requiring additional complexity for developers, shareholders and providers, I think we should send out a clear sign that we intend to provide liquidity only on BTC and USD, to finally move to USD .
6 Likes
I agree with ending PPC liquidity support. The pair seems to only be used as an easy way to dump PPC. This is bad for both PPC and the Nu network. The pair should remain available but not supported by our custodians.
1 Like
The motion to end PPC liquidity support is currently at 16.85% support over the past 10000 blocks, and it must exceed 50% in order to pass. For those interested in supporting this, enter the following motion hash into your minting client:
1 Like
Right now, I am against this motion since it lowers the role of PPC for Nu.
At the same time it lowers the possibility of creating liquidity of NuBits.
I sold a portion of PPCs to get NuBits.
In that case, in almost every timing scenario I can think of, you’re better off than you would have been if you would have held your PPC.
Having Custodians lose money for the benefit of peercoin holders is not in Nu shareholders’ best interests.
6 Likes
@ben.
I forgot to mention that I am against the original motion of chronos but I am in favor for the motion of JL.
Certainly but I fail to see how selling ppcs for nubits is detrimental for Custodians. Could you explain a bit?
It is at least beneficial for Nu as a whole, since it creates demand of NuBits, right?
Am I mistaken?
In any case, sorry for the lack of knowledge.
It’s fairly simple. I’ll use screenshots to illustrate:
BTC-e is one of the larger exchanges of peercoins in terms of volume and liquidity. Here’s a capture of the PPC/BTC order book from a few minutes ago.
And here’s a screen capture taken a few seconds later showing the NBT/PPC pair on CCEDK:
The PPC/USD exchange rate is down sharply over the last seven days:
This cannot end well if custodians continue to hold the bag and provide an easy to convert source of liquidity for everyone trying to exit the Peercoin market without radically adjusting the price.
2 Likes
Now that isn’t very fair. PPC price has been going down so we see more people selling. When the up thread eventually arrive, we could see the pair being a main venue to buy PPC.
I still support to remove the pair for cost/benefit reasons, under current liquidity condition, though. If btc-e lists NBT, it might be a different matter as it has high PPC liquidity.
1 Like
Would these people be selling if there wasn’t an available supply of liquidity that they could enter without further driving down the price of PPC?
Think of the implications: 1% of the total available supply of PPC Has been sold into Kiara’s wall.